H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Gilles Muller vs Daniel Munoz de la Nava
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Gilles Muller vs Daniel Munoz de la Nava.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LUX
Age 43
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 44
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gilles Muller | #966 | #21 | 1,930 | 2,071 | 200 | 199 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Daniel Munoz de la Nava | #1,384 | #68 | 732 | 1,761 | 9 | 28 | 24.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gilles Muller | Daniel Munoz de la Nava | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #69 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2005 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #76 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2006 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #105 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #117 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2008 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #95 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #248 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #134 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #54 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #147 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2012 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,834 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #368 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #171 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #47 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #194 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2015 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,893 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2016 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #34 | 1,956 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2017 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #25 | 1,939 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #351 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 2018 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #138 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |