H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Gilles Muller vs Edouard Roger-Vasselin H2H: 3-1

Gilles Muller holds a 3–1 lead over Edouard Roger-Vasselin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Gilles Muller leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Edouard Roger-Vasselin leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gilles Muller won the 2015 Chennai third round 6-7(11) 6-1 7-6(3).

LUX Age 43 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 1
4 main draw meetings
FRA Age 42 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 8, 2015* Chennai ATP 250 R32 Hard Gilles Muller #46 6-7(11) 6-1 7-6(3) Edouard Roger-Vasselin #116 Match data
Sep 18, 2014* Metz ATP 250 R32 Hard Gilles Muller #66 6-1 7-6(6) Edouard Roger-Vasselin #54 Match data
May 2, 2013* Estoril ATP 250 R32 Clay Edouard Roger-Vasselin #73 6-1 (ret.) Gilles Muller #67 Match data
Aug 31, 2011* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Gilles Muller #68 7-6(5) 6-4 6-4 Edouard Roger-Vasselin #110 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Gilles Muller #966 #21 1,930 2,071 200 199 50.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Edouard Roger-Vasselin #806 #35 1,133 1,885 84 125 40.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gilles Muller Edouard Roger-Vasselin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2002 0–1 0.0% #255 1,488 0 0
20 2003 0–1 0.0% #195 1,450 0 0 2004 1–2 33.3% #197 1,450 0 0
21 2004 10–8 55.6% #69 1,599 0 0
22 2005 20–21 48.8% #76 1,727 0 0
23 2006 11–20 35.5% #105 1,535 0 0 2007 5–7 41.7% #97 1,578 0 0
24 2007 2–3 40.0% #117 1,578 0 0 2008 2–6 25.0% #166 1,574 0 0
25 2008 5–6 45.5% #95 1,675 0 0 2009 2–3 40.0% #153 1,646 0 0
26 2009 5–9 35.7% #248 1,634 0 0 2010 2–7 22.2% #124 1,612 0 0
27 2010 2–2 50.0% #134 1,612 0 0 2011 6–12 33.3% #106 1,687 0 0
28 2011 14–11 56.0% #54 1,797 0 0 2012 14–19 42.4% #102 1,665 0 0
29 2012 20–20 50.0% #67 1,834 0 0 2013 23–26 46.9% #52 1,817 0 0
30 2013 2–7 22.2% #368 1,691 0 0 2014 21–28 42.9% #87 1,693 0 0
31 2014 4–6 40.0% #47 1,743 0 0 2015 6–12 33.3% #123 1,758 0 0
32 2015 31–24 56.4% #38 1,893 0 0 2016 2–3 40.0% #293 1,678 0 0
33 2016 33–23 58.9% #34 1,956 0 0
34 2017 32–18 64.0% #25 1,939 0 2
35 2018 9–19 32.1% #138 1,687 0 2