H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Gilles Muller vs Jean-Rene Lisnard H2H: 3-1
Gilles Muller holds a 3–1 lead over Jean-Rene Lisnard in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Gilles Muller leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gilles Muller won the 2005 Casablanca third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LUX
Age 43
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
MON
Age 46
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2005* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Gilles Muller | 7-5 6-2 | Jean-Rene Lisnard | Match data |
| Mar 8, 2005* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Gilles Muller | 6-4 7-5 | Jean-Rene Lisnard | Match data |
| Sep 30, 2004* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Gilles Muller | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | Jean-Rene Lisnard | Match data |
| Feb 27, 2003* | Copenhagen | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jean-Rene Lisnard | 7-5 6-4 | Gilles Muller | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gilles Muller | #966 | #21 | 1,930 | 2,071 | 200 | 199 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jean-Rene Lisnard | #1,437 | #84 | 478 | 1,693 | 41 | 79 | 34.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gilles Muller | Jean-Rene Lisnard | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #194 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #69 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #264 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #76 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #105 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #97 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #117 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #132 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #95 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #103 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #248 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #295 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #134 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2011 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #54 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2012 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,834 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #368 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #47 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #353 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2015 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,893 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1437 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2016 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #34 | 1,956 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2017 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #25 | 1,939 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2018 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #138 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |