H2H data updated: 2026-08-15 02:40 UTC

Gilles Muller vs Rajeev Ram

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Gilles Muller vs Rajeev Ram.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gilles Muller
LUX Age 43 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Rajeev Ram
USA Age 42 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
No head-to-head meetings found.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Gilles Muller #966 #21 1,930 2,075 203 201 50.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Rajeev Ram #1,076 #56 826 1,747 57 94 37.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gilles Muller Rajeev Ram
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,479 0 0
19 2002 0–1 0.0% #255 1,488 0 0 2003 1–1 50.0% — 1,492 0 0
20 2003 0–1 0.0% #195 1,450 0 0 2004 1–3 25.0% #297 1,474 0 0
21 2004 10–8 55.6% #69 1,600 0 0 2005 2–2 50.0% #195 1,490 0 0
22 2005 20–21 48.8% #76 1,728 0 0 2006 0–1 0.0% #197 1,457 0 0
23 2006 11–20 35.5% #105 1,534 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #253 1,417 0 0
24 2007 2–3 40.0% #117 1,577 0 0 2008 2–4 33.3% #190 1,479 0 0
25 2008 5–6 45.5% #95 1,672 0 0 2009 8–6 57.1% #79 1,587 0 1
26 2009 5–9 35.7% #248 1,632 0 0 2010 6–18 25.0% #184 1,591 0 1
27 2010 2–2 50.0% #134 1,610 0 0 2011 2–3 40.0% #149 1,606 0 1
28 2011 14–11 56.0% #54 1,797 0 0 2012 7–9 43.8% #132 1,636 0 1
29 2012 21–21 50.0% #67 1,839 0 0 2013 4–11 26.7% #127 1,646 0 1
30 2013 2–7 22.2% #368 1,693 0 0 2014 3–7 30.0% #139 1,660 0 1
31 2014 4–6 40.0% #47 1,745 0 0 2015 7–6 53.8% #89 1,654 0 2
32 2015 31–24 56.4% #38 1,894 0 0 2016 12–19 38.7% #129 1,616 0 2
33 2016 35–24 59.3% #34 1,967 0 0 2017 2–2 50.0% #353 1,582 0 2
34 2017 32–18 64.0% #25 1,942 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2018 9–19 32.1% #138 1,688 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gilles Muller Rajeev Ram
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2003 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2004 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2005 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 12 11 23 52.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 8 10 18 44.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2008 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2008 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
26 2009 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2010 4 12 16 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
27 2010 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2011 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2012 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
29 2012 14 14 28 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2013 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
30 2013 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
31 2014 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2015 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 5 0 5 100.0% — — — —
32 2015 23 18 41 56.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2016 9 11 20 45.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
33 2016 22 17 39 56.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 13 5 18 72.2% — — — — 2017 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 2017 16 12 28 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 5 10 15 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 137 131 268 51.1% 19 29 48 39.6% 45 36 81 55.6% 2 5 7 28.6% — 34 71 105 32.4% 4 7 11 36.4% 19 16 35 54.3% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 396/404 of Gilles Muller's and 150/151 of Rajeev Ram's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Gilles Muller Rajeev Ram
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 1/1 3.0 3.0 41.5% 55.6% 47.4% 60.0% 50.0% 50.8% 31.6%
19 2002 1/1 13.0 3.0 60.4% 77.6% 38.6% 70.0% 25.0% 62.2% 34.3% 2003 2/2 4.5 7.0 45.7% 78.9% 42.5% 55.0% 52.8% 59.1% 39.8%
20 2003 1/1 3.0 3.0 49.2% 56.7% 67.7% 33.3% 25.0% 62.3% 40.3% 2004 4/4 4.8 5.0 54.3% 75.1% 44.7% 56.9% 44.6% 61.5% 28.2%
21 2004 18/18 8.2 3.0 61.1% 70.3% 53.4% 48.8% 53.1% 63.5% 36.9% 2005 4/4 11.3 3.8 54.9% 75.5% 45.8% 56.4% 54.3% 62.1% 34.7%
22 2005 41/41 9.2 3.6 60.8% 73.4% 50.7% 64.0% 42.8% 64.5% 31.5% 2006 1/1 2.0 1.0 68.9% 74.5% 34.8% 0.0% 100.0% 62.2% 26.5%
23 2006 31/31 9.1 3.8 61.0% 72.5% 48.9% 64.2% 32.8% 63.0% 32.9% 2007 1/1 6.0 4.0 59.0% 71.4% 52.9% 55.6% 33.3% 63.9% 41.8%
24 2007 5/5 15.6 3.6 66.8% 72.1% 50.4% 56.1% 41.8% 64.9% 33.6% 2008 6/6 6.0 1.5 63.5% 69.6% 41.8% 45.8% 44.2% 59.3% 32.5%
25 2008 11/11 19.4 4.0 61.7% 77.1% 48.6% 69.2% 32.8% 66.0% 28.3% 2009 14/14 9.1 2.6 58.3% 77.3% 53.3% 73.2% 36.0% 67.3% 33.0%
26 2009 13/14 12.3 3.5 60.5% 74.5% 51.2% 57.7% 29.7% 65.5% 30.0% 2010 24/24 10.2 3.3 58.5% 71.2% 47.0% 42.4% 32.4% 61.1% 28.1%
27 2010 4/4 17.3 3.3 64.5% 81.3% 58.3% 50.0% 16.8% 72.8% 26.6% 2011 5/5 4.2 2.0 62.1% 70.2% 44.7% 44.7% 54.2% 61.1% 30.3%
28 2011 25/25 15.5 3.1 60.2% 80.0% 49.9% 63.1% 42.9% 68.4% 29.4% 2012 16/16 5.1 2.5 58.3% 74.9% 48.0% 58.8% 40.8% 63.4% 33.3%
29 2012 40/42 13.5 3.1 62.1% 81.2% 47.5% 64.0% 36.9% 68.6% 30.8% 2013 15/15 7.4 2.6 61.6% 69.7% 46.1% 58.8% 39.6% 60.8% 33.6%
30 2013 9/9 11.8 3.1 59.7% 73.9% 46.5% 60.7% 33.2% 63.0% 26.5% 2014 10/10 6.1 2.8 62.0% 70.2% 48.9% 62.0% 32.6% 62.2% 31.9%
31 2014 10/10 16.8 4.0 62.0% 76.4% 49.0% 49.3% 24.9% 66.4% 28.0% 2015 13/13 9.8 2.4 63.0% 75.6% 53.0% 65.0% 44.1% 67.1% 31.1%
32 2015 55/55 13.9 3.7 60.6% 79.6% 50.8% 69.0% 39.4% 68.4% 32.2% 2016 30/31 7.2 3.0 63.5% 72.6% 50.5% 60.9% 35.2% 64.4% 33.3%
33 2016 56/59 15.3 3.6 60.8% 82.1% 53.2% 61.4% 37.0% 70.6% 32.6% 2017 4/4 6.8 4.3 55.8% 74.6% 53.0% 69.8% 22.4% 65.2% 32.7%
34 2017 48/50 14.7 3.9 63.0% 80.1% 52.7% 70.9% 43.0% 69.6% 32.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 28/28 15.0 4.8 61.4% 78.3% 47.3% 58.5% 28.4% 66.2% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 396/404 13.4 3.6 61.3% 77.9% 50.6% 63.2% 37.9% 67.3% 31.7% — 150/151 7.6 2.9 60.2% 72.8% 48.6% 57.4% 38.6% 63.1% 32.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gilles Muller Rajeev Ram
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1486 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1479 99.7 +2.35 +0.19 0.641 41.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — -0.12
19 2002 1488 100.0 -3.28 -2.21 0.908 49.0% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 +0.06 2003 1493 105.3 -0.85 +0.13 0.972 50.4% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — -0.01
20 2003 1451 96.0 +2.20 -4.69 1.068 50.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — +0.01 2004 1474 102.9 -3.28 -0.64 0.731 44.5% +28 — — 27.3% -1.55 1–0 1–1 +0.20
21 2004 1600 126.5 +0.44 -0.24 1.013 50.1% +38 — — 44.2% -0.09 7–1 (88%) 1–6 (14%) +0.50 2005 1490 105.6 -0.27 -2.37 0.916 49.5% +13 — — 54.5% 0.00 0–1 3–1 (75%) +0.23
22 2005 1728 137.8 +2.01 -3.76 0.888 48.6% -10 -178 -152 44.8% -0.60 6–5 (55%) 13–6 (68%) -2.04 2006 1458 100.0 +0.64 -0.34 0.700 45.1% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — -0.05
23 2006 1535 118.4 -0.34 -3.26 0.890 48.8% +78 -6 -43 36.1% -0.67 1–4 (20%) 5–9 (36%) +1.50 2007 1418 101.5 -4.12 -2.14 1.157 51.3% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — +0.10
24 2007 1578 104.7 +1.65 -2.99 0.958 49.5% -32 — — 30.8% -0.77 — 1–1 +0.07 2008 1479 114.5 -1.05 -1.49 0.798 46.4% +22 — — 40.0% -0.80 0–1 3–3 (50%) +0.18
25 2008 1673 122.4 +2.48 -2.87 0.833 48.5% +20 — — 45.7% -0.34 2–2 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 0.00 2009 1587 122.4 +1.13 -1.70 1.010 50.2% -72 — +149 52.8% +0.11 3–1 (75%) 2–4 (33%) +0.62
26 2009 1632 120.3 +1.24 -3.51 0.868 48.1% +68 — -102 40.0% -0.63 1–2 (33%) 5–2 (71%) +0.37 2010 1592 116.0 -1.64 -5.51 0.722 44.9% -24 — +108 33.3% -1.42 3–6 (33%) 7–6 (54%) +0.43
27 2010 1611 114.3 -1.03 -2.96 0.979 49.2% — — — 50.0% -0.10 1–1 2–2 (50%) +0.36 2011 1606 115.8 -0.85 -2.60 0.778 45.9% +3 — — 50.0% -0.50 1–1 0–1 +0.04
28 2011 1798 145.1 +4.00 -3.93 0.931 49.6% 0 — -130 55.4% -0.09 2–5 (29%) 16–11 (59%) -0.21 2012 1636 116.2 -0.05 -3.04 0.910 48.7% -41 — +70 46.9% -0.37 0–1 4–3 (57%) +1.31
29 2012 1840 148.8 +4.06 -4.34 0.979 49.8% +31 -246 -188 46.8% -0.15 10–7 (59%) 16–17 (48%) -1.49 2013 1646 124.3 -1.43 -2.54 0.856 47.5% -6 — +8 40.0% -0.65 0–5 (0%) 2–1 (67%) +0.26
30 2013 1693 117.5 +0.19 -5.50 0.716 45.7% +67 -160 — 25.0% -1.30 1–1 3–3 (50%) -0.15 2014 1660 116.5 -1.91 -1.96 0.844 47.1% +1 — — 30.4% -1.13 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) +0.56
31 2014 1746 140.5 +1.86 -1.98 0.832 47.2% +9 — — 44.4% -0.71 1–2 (33%) 5–3 (63%) -0.81 2015 1654 122.8 +0.37 -2.07 0.944 49.7% -77 — +184 52.8% -0.14 4–3 (57%) 8–3 (73%) +0.64
32 2015 1895 162.5 +4.09 -2.33 1.019 50.8% -11 -296 -39 53.9% +0.26 11–8 (58%) 27–18 (60%) -1.40 2016 1616 133.0 -0.28 -2.91 0.934 49.1% +28 -86 +111 40.3% -0.65 3–4 (43%) 12–5 (71%) +0.81
33 2016 1968 159.7 +6.13 -2.52 1.108 51.4% -19 — -21 55.2% +0.31 10–8 (56%) 24–21 (53%) -1.52 2017 1583 110.5 +0.38 -1.49 0.939 48.0% — -26 — 44.4% -0.78 1–0 2–0 +0.47
34 2017 1943 155.8 +4.71 -2.01 1.074 51.2% -86 -275 +132 59.7% +0.47 9–4 (69%) 19–10 (66%) -0.47 2018 1563 95.7 — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 1689 130.9 +1.83 -3.86 0.921 48.7% +15 -57 +271 39.0% -0.55 3–6 (33%) 9–10 (47%) +1.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1551 95.8 — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2076 149.9 +3.17 -2.99 0.969 49.8% +2 -175 -5 48.4% -0.13 65–57 (53%) 152–124 (55%) -1.01 — 1747 123.1 -0.63 -2.79 0.869 47.8% -13 -66 +108 41.7% -0.67 18–26 (41%) 44–31 (59%) +3.78

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.