H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Gilles Muller vs Razvan Sabau H2H: 1-0
Gilles Muller holds a 1–0 lead over Razvan Sabau in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gilles Muller leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gilles Muller won the 2006 Chennai third round 6-2 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LUX
Age 43
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 49
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2006* | Chennai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Gilles Muller | 6-2 7-6(5) | Razvan Sabau | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gilles Muller | #966 | #21 | 1,930 | 2,071 | 200 | 199 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Razvan Sabau | #1,609 | #74 | 500 | 1,530 | 17 | 43 | 28.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gilles Muller | Razvan Sabau | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1178 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #521 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #342 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #254 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #69 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #76 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #105 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #117 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2008 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #95 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,403 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #248 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #149 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #134 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #54 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #112 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2012 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,834 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #182 | 1,407 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #368 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #47 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2015 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,893 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2016 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #34 | 1,956 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2017 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #25 | 1,939 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2018 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #138 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |