H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Gilles Muller vs Robby Ginepri H2H: 2-2

Gilles Muller and Robby Ginepri are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Gilles Muller won the 2011 Atlanta round of 16 7-6(6) 2-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gilles Muller
LUX Age 43 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Robby Ginepri
USA Age 43 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gilles Muller #82 7-6(6) 2-6 6-2 Robby Ginepri #369 Match data Jul 22, 2011* R16 Atlanta ATP 250 Hard
Robby Ginepri #21 6-4 6-4 Gilles Muller #67 Match data Oct 7, 2005* R16 Japan Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Robby Ginepri #46 6-1 6-1 6-4 Gilles Muller #68 Match data Sep 2, 2005* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Gilles Muller #75 7-6(5) 7-5 Robby Ginepri #63 Match data Jul 30, 2005* QF Los Angeles Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gilles Muller #966 #21 1,930 2,076 203 202 50.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Robby Ginepri #1,221 #15 1,525 1,927 185 195 48.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gilles Muller Robby Ginepri
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2001 3–5 37.5% #175 1,522 0 0
19 2002 0–1 0.0% #255 1,488 0 0 2002 6–12 33.3% #100 1,580 0 0
20 2003 0–1 0.0% #195 1,450 0 0 2003 31–19 62.0% #32 1,785 0 1
21 2004 10–8 55.6% #69 1,600 0 0 2004 19–24 44.2% #63 1,696 0 1
22 2005 20–21 48.8% #76 1,728 0 0 2005 37–23 61.7% #15 1,883 0 2
23 2006 11–20 35.5% #105 1,534 0 0 2006 23–24 48.9% #51 1,803 0 2
24 2007 2–3 40.0% #117 1,577 0 0 2007 11–20 35.5% #134 1,716 0 2
25 2008 5–6 45.5% #95 1,672 0 0 2008 25–20 55.6% #51 1,813 0 2
26 2009 5–9 35.7% #248 1,632 0 0 2009 13–18 41.9% #100 1,688 0 3
27 2010 2–2 50.0% #134 1,610 0 0 2010 8–12 40.0% #144 1,670 0 3
28 2011 14–11 56.0% #54 1,797 0 0 2011 2–4 33.3% #311 1,666 0 3
29 2012 21–21 50.0% #67 1,839 0 0 2012 2–4 33.3% #287 1,598 0 3
30 2013 2–8 20.0% #368 1,678 0 0 2013 2–2 50.0% #214 1,638 0 3
31 2014 4–6 40.0% #47 1,737 0 0 2014 3–8 27.3% #223 1,700 0 3
32 2015 31–24 56.4% #38 1,893 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2016 35–24 59.3% #34 1,968 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2017 32–18 64.0% #25 1,943 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2018 9–19 32.1% #138 1,689 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gilles Muller Robby Ginepri
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2002 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 1 9 10 10.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
20 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 24 14 38 63.2% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 2004 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 15 17 32 46.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2005 12 11 23 52.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2005 33 14 47 70.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 2006 8 10 18 44.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 16 15 31 51.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
24 2007 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2007 9 13 22 40.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
25 2008 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 18 13 31 58.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2009 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2009 11 13 24 45.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
27 2010 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2010 4 9 13 30.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2011 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2011 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 14 14 28 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2012 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 2 4 6 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
31 2014 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2014 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2015 23 18 41 56.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 22 17 39 56.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 13 5 18 72.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 16 12 28 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 5 10 15 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 137 131 268 51.1% 19 30 49 38.8% 45 36 81 55.6% 2 5 7 28.6% — 141 135 276 51.1% 12 26 38 31.6% 24 26 50 48.0% 8 8 16 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 397/405 of Gilles Muller's and 369/380 of Robby Ginepri's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Gilles Muller Robby Ginepri
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 6/8 5.3 4.5 53.5% 67.1% 54.6% 60.8% 34.8% 61.0% 36.6%
19 2002 1/1 13.0 3.0 60.4% 77.6% 38.6% 70.0% 25.0% 62.2% 34.3% 2002 15/18 4.1 4.2 59.2% 64.5% 42.8% 42.3% 38.8% 55.7% 33.8%
20 2003 1/1 3.0 3.0 49.2% 56.7% 67.7% 33.3% 25.0% 62.3% 40.3% 2003 46/50 7.5 3.2 60.7% 72.6% 55.4% 55.0% 42.2% 65.6% 39.3%
21 2004 18/18 8.2 3.0 61.1% 70.3% 53.4% 48.8% 53.1% 63.5% 36.9% 2004 43/43 5.4 2.5 60.4% 69.0% 51.7% 56.2% 44.6% 62.3% 37.6%
22 2005 41/41 9.2 3.6 60.8% 73.4% 50.7% 64.0% 42.8% 64.5% 31.5% 2005 60/60 6.6 1.8 63.2% 71.8% 55.4% 56.0% 46.0% 65.9% 38.4%
23 2006 31/31 9.1 3.8 61.0% 72.5% 48.9% 64.2% 32.8% 63.0% 32.9% 2006 47/47 6.0 1.6 64.9% 70.0% 52.8% 50.9% 40.9% 63.7% 37.3%
24 2007 5/5 15.6 3.6 66.8% 72.1% 50.4% 56.1% 41.8% 64.9% 33.6% 2007 31/31 6.2 1.8 63.5% 69.3% 49.8% 56.7% 44.2% 62.1% 37.3%
25 2008 11/11 19.4 4.0 61.7% 77.1% 48.6% 69.2% 32.8% 66.0% 28.3% 2008 43/45 5.3 1.9 63.9% 69.8% 51.1% 58.5% 42.6% 63.1% 39.3%
26 2009 13/14 12.3 3.5 60.5% 74.5% 51.2% 57.7% 29.7% 65.5% 30.0% 2009 31/31 5.3 2.0 62.6% 70.1% 48.8% 58.3% 44.6% 62.0% 35.5%
27 2010 4/4 17.3 3.3 64.5% 81.3% 58.3% 50.0% 16.8% 72.8% 26.6% 2010 20/20 5.6 2.0 64.4% 67.5% 54.9% 57.6% 34.7% 63.2% 34.6%
28 2011 25/25 15.5 3.1 60.2% 80.0% 49.9% 63.1% 42.9% 68.4% 29.4% 2011 6/6 5.8 2.2 57.7% 66.7% 56.0% 43.5% 23.8% 62.0% 34.7%
29 2012 40/42 13.5 3.1 62.1% 81.2% 47.5% 64.0% 36.9% 68.6% 30.8% 2012 6/6 4.0 2.8 60.6% 66.4% 55.9% 63.6% 44.6% 61.8% 36.8%
30 2013 10/10 11.2 3.5 59.1% 73.6% 45.8% 58.0% 33.2% 62.3% 27.8% 2013 4/4 1.8 2.8 61.5% 61.1% 47.6% 56.3% 30.0% 55.6% 32.8%
31 2014 10/10 16.8 4.0 62.0% 76.4% 49.0% 49.3% 24.9% 66.4% 28.0% 2014 11/11 3.3 2.5 63.5% 64.0% 48.7% 55.8% 33.9% 58.3% 31.6%
32 2015 55/55 13.9 3.7 60.6% 79.6% 50.8% 69.0% 39.4% 68.4% 32.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 56/59 15.3 3.6 60.8% 82.1% 53.2% 61.4% 37.0% 70.6% 32.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 48/50 14.7 3.9 63.0% 80.1% 52.7% 70.9% 43.0% 69.6% 32.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 28/28 15.0 4.8 61.4% 78.3% 47.3% 58.5% 28.4% 66.2% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 397/405 13.4 3.6 61.3% 77.9% 50.6% 63.2% 37.8% 67.3% 31.7% — 369/380 5.8 2.3 62.4% 69.6% 52.3% 55.3% 42.0% 63.1% 37.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gilles Muller Robby Ginepri
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1481 95.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1523 117.9 -1.15 -0.35 0.938 49.1% +26 — — 38.1% -0.72 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.08
19 2002 1488 100.0 -3.28 -2.21 0.908 49.0% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.06 2002 1581 123.3 -3.20 -1.12 0.763 45.0% -76 — +50 34.1% -1.16 3–3 (50%) 1–5 (17%) — -0.63
20 2003 1451 96.0 +2.20 -4.69 1.068 50.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — 0.00 2003 1785 147.0 +2.49 +2.21 1.143 52.3% -12 — -95 59.5% +0.79 7–7 (50%) 13–12 (52%) — +0.42
21 2004 1600 126.5 +0.44 -0.24 1.013 50.1% +38 — — 44.2% -0.09 7–1 (88%) 1–6 (14%) — +0.52 2004 1696 139.3 -0.17 +1.22 0.999 50.0% +8 -189 +68 47.2% +0.06 5–6 (45%) 5–9 (36%) — -0.03
22 2005 1728 137.8 +2.01 -3.76 0.888 48.6% -9 -178 -152 44.8% -0.60 6–5 (55%) 13–6 (68%) — -2.15 2005 1884 148.3 +3.25 +1.61 1.126 52.0% +2 -411 -180 58.5% +0.73 10–6 (63%) 8–15 (35%) — +0.02
23 2006 1535 118.4 -0.34 -3.26 0.890 48.8% +78 -6 -43 36.1% -0.67 1–4 (20%) 5–9 (36%) — +1.32 2006 1803 139.7 +1.18 +0.14 1.029 50.3% +34 -366 -144 51.6% +0.12 8–11 (42%) 9–9 (50%) — +1.42
24 2007 1578 104.7 +1.65 -2.99 0.958 49.5% -32 — — 30.8% -0.77 — 1–1 — +0.07 2007 1717 139.0 -0.35 +0.22 0.983 49.8% +57 -332 -113 45.3% -0.09 2–10 (17%) 5–5 (50%) — -1.49
25 2008 1673 122.4 +2.48 -2.87 0.833 48.5% +20 — — 45.7% -0.34 2–2 (50%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.16 2008 1813 148.5 +0.26 +2.58 1.067 51.2% +14 -260 -197 52.6% +0.37 10–6 (63%) 12–10 (55%) — -0.93
26 2009 1632 120.3 +1.24 -3.51 0.868 48.1% +68 — -102 40.0% -0.63 1–2 (33%) 5–2 (71%) — +0.29 2009 1689 131.9 -1.77 -0.74 0.934 48.9% +36 — -85 46.3% -0.13 4–9 (31%) 6–10 (38%) — +2.41
27 2010 1610 114.3 -1.03 -2.96 0.979 49.2% — — — 50.0% -0.10 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.27 2010 1670 126.1 +0.51 -0.78 0.940 48.8% -63 -1 -87 44.1% -0.49 2–5 (29%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.46
28 2011 1798 145.1 +4.00 -3.93 0.931 49.6% 0 — -131 55.4% -0.09 2–5 (29%) 16–11 (59%) — -0.32 2011 1667 118.7 -2.56 +0.17 0.913 48.0% -59 — — 37.5% -0.25 0–1 0–2 — +0.11
29 2012 1840 148.8 +4.06 -4.34 0.979 49.8% +31 -246 -188 46.8% -0.15 10–7 (59%) 16–17 (48%) — -1.66 2012 1598 118.5 -0.95 +0.14 0.963 49.4% +2 — — 41.2% -0.41 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.15
30 2013 1678 116.7 +0.08 -5.24 0.738 45.9% +82 -165 — 26.1% -1.22 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.20 2013 1638 118.5 -0.64 -2.79 0.739 45.0% — +48 — 44.4% -0.67 1–0 — — +0.21
31 2014 1738 140.5 +1.86 -1.97 0.832 47.2% +17 — — 44.4% -0.71 1–2 (33%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.77 2014 1701 134.2 -3.94 -0.08 0.759 45.0% +1 — — 26.9% -1.58 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — -1.38
32 2015 1894 162.5 +4.09 -2.33 1.019 50.8% -10 -311 -37 53.9% +0.26 11–8 (58%) 27–18 (60%) — -1.33 2015 1652 113.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 1968 159.7 +6.13 -2.52 1.108 51.4% -18 — -20 55.2% +0.31 10–8 (56%) 24–21 (53%) — -1.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 1943 156.0 +4.71 -2.01 1.074 51.2% -84 -284 +133 59.7% +0.47 9–4 (69%) 19–10 (66%) — -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 1689 131.0 +1.83 -3.86 0.921 48.7% +16 -65 +271 39.0% -0.55 3–6 (33%) 9–10 (47%) — +1.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2076 149.8 +3.16 -2.99 0.969 49.8% +3 -180 -5 48.3% -0.13 65–58 (53%) 152–124 (55%) 106.3 -1.18 — 1928 144.7 +0.52 +0.83 1.010 50.1% +7 -235 -76 49.6% +0.10 57–68 (46%) 67–87 (44%) 95.0 +0.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.