H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Gilles Muller vs Takao Suzuki

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Gilles Muller vs Takao Suzuki.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gilles Muller
LUX Age 43 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main-draw meetings
Takao Suzuki
JPN Age 49 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Takao Suzuki #303 7-6(5) 7-6(5) Gilles Muller #159 Match data Oct 4, 2010 Q1 Q Japan Open ATP 500 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gilles Muller #966 #21 1,930 2,076 203 202 50.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Takao Suzuki #1,016 #102 470 1,669 23 34 40.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gilles Muller Takao Suzuki
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1995 0–2 0.0% #487 1,473 0 0
19 2002 0–1 0.0% #255 1,488 0 0 1996 1–1 50.0% #517 1,493 0 0
20 2003 0–1 0.0% #195 1,450 0 0 1997 1–1 50.0% #272 1,506 0 0
21 2004 10–8 55.6% #69 1,600 0 0 1998 2–2 50.0% #115 1,544 0 0
22 2005 20–21 48.8% #76 1,728 0 0 1999 1–9 10.0% #262 1,462 0 0
23 2006 11–20 35.5% #105 1,534 0 0 2000 1–1 50.0% #160 1,477 0 0
24 2007 2–3 40.0% #117 1,577 0 0 2001 3–2 60.0% #225 1,516 0 0
25 2008 5–6 45.5% #95 1,672 0 0 2002 2–4 33.3% #136 1,506 0 0
26 2009 5–9 35.7% #248 1,632 0 0 2003 4–3 57.1% #205 1,609 0 0
27 2010 2–2 50.0% #134 1,610 0 0 2004 2–3 40.0% #212 1,610 0 0
28 2011 14–11 56.0% #54 1,797 0 0 2005 1–2 33.3% #272 1,588 0 0
29 2012 21–21 50.0% #67 1,839 0 0 2006 3–1 75.0% #471 1,619 0 0
30 2013 2–8 20.0% #368 1,678 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #241 1,543 0 0
31 2014 4–6 40.0% #47 1,737 0 0 2008 2–1 66.7% #509 1,543 0 0
32 2015 31–24 56.4% #38 1,893 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #282 1,541 0 0
33 2016 35–24 59.3% #34 1,968 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2017 32–18 64.0% #25 1,943 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2018 9–19 32.1% #138 1,689 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gilles Muller Takao Suzuki
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2002 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1998 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 12 11 23 52.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1999 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
23 2006 8 10 18 44.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2001 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2008 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2009 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2003 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
27 2010 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2004 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2011 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2005 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 14 14 28 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2006 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 2 4 6 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2008 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 23 18 41 56.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 22 17 39 56.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 13 5 18 72.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 16 12 28 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 5 10 15 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 137 131 268 51.1% 19 30 49 38.8% 45 36 81 55.6% 2 5 7 28.6% — 22 29 51 43.1% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 397/405 of Gilles Muller's and 24/24 of Takao Suzuki's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Gilles Muller Takao Suzuki
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2002 1/1 13.0 3.0 60.4% 77.6% 38.6% 70.0% 25.0% 62.2% 34.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2003 1/1 3.0 3.0 49.2% 56.7% 67.7% 33.3% 25.0% 62.3% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 18/18 8.2 3.0 61.1% 70.3% 53.4% 48.8% 53.1% 63.5% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 41/41 9.2 3.6 60.8% 73.4% 50.7% 64.0% 42.8% 64.5% 31.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 31/31 9.1 3.8 61.0% 72.5% 48.9% 64.2% 32.8% 63.0% 32.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 5/5 15.6 3.6 66.8% 72.1% 50.4% 56.1% 41.8% 64.9% 33.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2008 11/11 19.4 4.0 61.7% 77.1% 48.6% 69.2% 32.8% 66.0% 28.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2009 13/14 12.3 3.5 60.5% 74.5% 51.2% 57.7% 29.7% 65.5% 30.0% 2003 7/7 7.7 3.1 58.1% 73.1% 52.8% 74.9% 39.7% 65.0% 34.3%
27 2010 4/4 17.3 3.3 64.5% 81.3% 58.3% 50.0% 16.8% 72.8% 26.6% 2004 5/5 11.8 3.8 62.6% 75.8% 48.5% 49.7% 52.6% 65.6% 32.4%
28 2011 25/25 15.5 3.1 60.2% 80.0% 49.9% 63.1% 42.9% 68.4% 29.4% 2005 3/3 10.3 2.7 64.5% 73.2% 58.4% 82.3% 63.9% 67.6% 29.6%
29 2012 40/42 13.5 3.1 62.1% 81.2% 47.5% 64.0% 36.9% 68.6% 30.8% 2006 4/4 12.8 2.5 62.7% 80.9% 66.7% 87.5% 50.0% 75.5% 29.2%
30 2013 10/10 11.2 3.5 59.1% 73.6% 45.8% 58.0% 33.2% 62.3% 27.8% 2007 1/1 12.0 4.0 54.3% 76.5% 60.5% 50.0% 14.3% 69.1% 32.4%
31 2014 10/10 16.8 4.0 62.0% 76.4% 49.0% 49.3% 24.9% 66.4% 28.0% 2008 3/3 12.0 2.3 60.0% 77.6% 50.9% 68.4% 44.4% 66.4% 33.0%
32 2015 55/55 13.9 3.7 60.6% 79.6% 50.8% 69.0% 39.4% 68.4% 32.2% 2009 1/1 4.0 2.0 60.9% 57.1% 72.2% 0.0% 0.0% 63.0% 26.7%
33 2016 56/59 15.3 3.6 60.8% 82.1% 53.2% 61.4% 37.0% 70.6% 32.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 48/50 14.7 3.9 63.0% 80.1% 52.7% 70.9% 43.0% 69.6% 32.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 28/28 15.0 4.8 61.4% 78.3% 47.3% 58.5% 28.4% 66.2% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 397/405 13.4 3.6 61.3% 77.9% 50.6% 63.2% 37.8% 67.3% 31.7% — 24/57 10.3 3.0 60.8% 75.0% 55.8% 67.7% 45.0% 67.5% 31.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gilles Muller Takao Suzuki
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1473 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.09
19 2002 1488 100.0 -3.28 -2.21 0.908 49.0% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.06 1996 1493 109.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.16
20 2003 1451 96.0 +2.20 -4.69 1.068 50.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — 0.00 1997 1507 105.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.04
21 2004 1600 126.5 +0.44 -0.24 1.013 50.1% +38 — — 44.2% -0.09 7–1 (88%) 1–6 (14%) 105.2 +0.52 1998 1545 118.3 — — — — +30 — — 44.4% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — -0.29
22 2005 1728 137.8 +2.01 -3.76 0.888 48.6% -9 -178 -152 44.8% -0.60 6–5 (55%) 13–6 (68%) 107.5 -2.15 1999 1462 115.1 — — — — +53 — — 30.0% -1.20 0–4 (0%) 1–6 (14%) 91.0 -0.13
23 2006 1535 118.4 -0.34 -3.26 0.890 48.8% +78 -6 -43 36.1% -0.67 1–4 (20%) 5–9 (36%) 92.3 +1.32 2000 1477 103.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.83 1–1 — — +0.17
24 2007 1578 104.7 +1.65 -2.99 0.958 49.5% -32 — — 30.8% -0.77 — 1–1 — +0.07 2001 1517 105.7 — — — — +20 — — 50.0% -0.21 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.26
25 2008 1673 122.4 +2.48 -2.87 0.833 48.5% +20 — — 45.7% -0.34 2–2 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 103.7 +0.16 2002 1506 104.2 — — — — +14 — — 35.7% -0.93 1–1 1–1 — +0.27
26 2009 1632 120.3 +1.24 -3.51 0.868 48.1% +68 — -102 40.0% -0.63 1–2 (33%) 5–2 (71%) 101.7 +0.29 2003 1609 114.1 -2.01 -0.21 0.982 49.9% -33 — — 56.3% -0.13 — 4–1 (80%) — +0.23
27 2010 1610 114.3 -1.03 -2.96 0.979 49.2% — — — 50.0% -0.10 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.27 2004 1611 113.5 +1.14 -2.01 0.942 49.1% +12 — — 42.9% -0.86 1–1 4–2 (67%) — -0.08
28 2011 1798 145.1 +4.00 -3.93 0.931 49.6% 0 — -131 55.4% -0.09 2–5 (29%) 16–11 (59%) 101.5 -0.32 2005 1588 114.1 -0.19 +2.68 0.913 49.3% +55 — — 44.4% +0.22 0–1 0–1 — -0.25
29 2012 1840 148.8 +4.06 -4.34 0.979 49.8% +31 -246 -188 46.8% -0.15 10–7 (59%) 16–17 (48%) 102.7 -1.66 2006 1619 124.5 +2.96 -0.08 1.193 53.1% +51 — — 63.6% +1.28 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 102.8 +0.05
30 2013 1678 116.7 +0.08 -5.24 0.738 45.9% +82 -165 — 26.1% -1.22 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 98.0 -0.20 2007 1544 100.8 -3.25 +0.61 1.049 50.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — -0.05
31 2014 1738 140.5 +1.86 -1.97 0.832 47.2% +17 — — 44.4% -0.71 1–2 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 101.0 -0.77 2008 1543 102.7 +1.12 -0.43 0.981 50.2% +54 — — 62.5% -0.13 1–1 3–0 (100%) — +0.15
32 2015 1894 162.5 +4.09 -2.33 1.019 50.8% -10 -311 -37 53.9% +0.26 11–8 (58%) 27–18 (60%) 107.4 -1.33 2009 1541 112.1 +2.43 +1.00 0.722 42.5% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.10
33 2016 1968 159.7 +6.13 -2.52 1.108 51.4% -18 — -20 55.2% +0.31 10–8 (56%) 24–21 (53%) 101.5 -1.98 2010 1546 106.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 1943 156.0 +4.71 -2.01 1.074 51.2% -84 -284 +133 59.7% +0.47 9–4 (69%) 19–10 (66%) 107.2 -0.32 2011 1528 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 1689 131.0 +1.83 -3.86 0.921 48.7% +16 -65 +271 39.0% -0.55 3–6 (33%) 9–10 (47%) 92.5 +1.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1512 99.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1508 95.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2076 149.8 +3.16 -2.99 0.969 49.8% +3 -180 -5 48.3% -0.13 65–58 (53%) 152–124 (55%) 106.3 -1.18 — 1669 118.5 +0.23 -0.15 0.981 49.9% +27 — — 43.2% -0.56 9–11 (45%) 18–15 (55%) 105.7 +0.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.