H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Gilles Muller vs Thomas Fabbiano H2H: 0-1

Thomas Fabbiano holds a 1–0 lead over Gilles Muller in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thomas Fabbiano leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Fabbiano won the 2016 Chennai round of 16 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gilles Muller
LUX Age 43 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Thomas Fabbiano
ITA Age 37 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thomas Fabbiano #157 6-4 7-5 Gilles Muller #38 Match data Jan 8, 2016* R16 Chennai ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gilles Muller #966 #21 1,930 2,076 203 202 50.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Thomas Fabbiano #1,768 #70 715 1,748 27 63 30.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gilles Muller Thomas Fabbiano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2002 0–1 0.0% #255 1,488 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #371 1,533 0 0
20 2003 0–1 0.0% #195 1,450 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2004 10–8 55.6% #69 1,600 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #313 1,552 0 0
22 2005 20–21 48.8% #76 1,728 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2006 11–20 35.5% #105 1,534 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2007 2–3 40.0% #117 1,577 0 0 2013 0–1 0.0% #180 1,543 0 0
25 2008 5–6 45.5% #95 1,672 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2009 5–9 35.7% #248 1,632 0 0 2015 0–3 0.0% #157 1,602 0 0
27 2010 2–2 50.0% #134 1,610 0 0 2016 5–10 33.3% #124 1,613 0 0
28 2011 14–11 56.0% #54 1,797 0 0 2017 4–12 25.0% #73 1,593 0 0
29 2012 21–21 50.0% #67 1,839 0 0 2018 8–12 40.0% #101 1,670 0 0
30 2013 2–8 20.0% #368 1,678 0 0 2019 10–18 35.7% #114 1,638 0 0
31 2014 4–6 40.0% #47 1,737 0 0 2020 0–1 0.0% #172 1,593 0 0
32 2015 31–24 56.4% #38 1,893 0 0 2021 0–3 0.0% #204 1,517 0 0
33 2016 35–24 59.3% #34 1,968 0 0 2022 0–1 0.0% #317 1,526 0 0
34 2017 32–18 64.0% #25 1,943 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2018 9–19 32.1% #138 1,689 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gilles Muller Thomas Fabbiano
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2002 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 12 11 23 52.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 8 10 18 44.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2008 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2009 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2015 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2010 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2016 4 6 10 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2011 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2017 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2012 14 14 28 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2018 3 7 10 30.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
30 2013 2 4 6 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2019 3 9 12 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
31 2014 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 23 18 41 56.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2021 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2016 22 17 39 56.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 13 5 18 72.2% — — — — 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 16 12 28 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 5 10 15 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 137 131 268 51.1% 19 30 49 38.8% 45 36 81 55.6% 2 5 7 28.6% — 13 37 50 26.0% 6 20 26 23.1% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 397/405 of Gilles Muller's and 89/90 of Thomas Fabbiano's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Gilles Muller Thomas Fabbiano
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2002 1/1 13.0 3.0 60.4% 77.6% 38.6% 70.0% 25.0% 62.2% 34.3% 2008 1/1 3.0 6.0 69.4% 66.2% 52.9% 40.0% 16.7% 62.2% 31.9%
20 2003 1/1 3.0 3.0 49.2% 56.7% 67.7% 33.3% 25.0% 62.3% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 18/18 8.2 3.0 61.1% 70.3% 53.4% 48.8% 53.1% 63.5% 36.9% 2010 1/1 3.0 2.0 52.9% 59.5% 51.5% 40.0% — 55.7% 21.7%
22 2005 41/41 9.2 3.6 60.8% 73.4% 50.7% 64.0% 42.8% 64.5% 31.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 31/31 9.1 3.8 61.0% 72.5% 48.9% 64.2% 32.8% 63.0% 32.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 5/5 15.6 3.6 66.8% 72.1% 50.4% 56.1% 41.8% 64.9% 33.6% 2013 1/1 0.0 7.0 66.1% 63.9% 45.9% 75.0% 20.0% 57.8% 25.5%
25 2008 11/11 19.4 4.0 61.7% 77.1% 48.6% 69.2% 32.8% 66.0% 28.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2009 13/14 12.3 3.5 60.5% 74.5% 51.2% 57.7% 29.7% 65.5% 30.0% 2015 3/3 1.7 3.0 68.2% 62.0% 39.1% 50.0% 42.6% 54.6% 31.2%
27 2010 4/4 17.3 3.3 64.5% 81.3% 58.3% 50.0% 16.8% 72.8% 26.6% 2016 14/15 2.0 2.6 67.4% 62.9% 44.7% 54.2% 44.3% 56.9% 38.3%
28 2011 25/25 15.5 3.1 60.2% 80.0% 49.9% 63.1% 42.9% 68.4% 29.4% 2017 16/16 1.8 3.7 63.4% 64.2% 46.4% 46.3% 25.5% 57.8% 36.2%
29 2012 40/42 13.5 3.1 62.1% 81.2% 47.5% 64.0% 36.9% 68.6% 30.8% 2018 20/20 1.9 3.4 63.5% 62.7% 51.0% 62.6% 43.4% 58.0% 38.8%
30 2013 10/10 11.2 3.5 59.1% 73.6% 45.8% 58.0% 33.2% 62.3% 27.8% 2019 28/28 2.3 3.1 65.8% 67.2% 51.4% 55.8% 37.5% 61.8% 34.6%
31 2014 10/10 16.8 4.0 62.0% 76.4% 49.0% 49.3% 24.9% 66.4% 28.0% 2020 1/1 1.0 0.0 59.5% 52.0% 29.4% 37.5% 14.3% 42.9% 38.8%
32 2015 55/55 13.9 3.7 60.6% 79.6% 50.8% 69.0% 39.4% 68.4% 32.2% 2021 3/3 1.7 2.7 69.5% 61.6% 54.2% 64.8% 30.0% 59.3% 37.4%
33 2016 56/59 15.3 3.6 60.8% 82.1% 53.2% 61.4% 37.0% 70.6% 32.6% 2022 1/1 0.0 2.0 70.1% 61.7% 40.0% 42.9% 66.7% 55.2% 32.8%
34 2017 48/50 14.7 3.9 63.0% 80.1% 52.7% 70.9% 43.0% 69.6% 32.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 28/28 15.0 4.8 61.4% 78.3% 47.3% 58.5% 28.4% 66.2% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 397/405 13.4 3.6 61.3% 77.9% 50.6% 63.2% 37.8% 67.3% 31.7% — 89/90 2.0 3.2 65.2% 64.2% 48.6% 55.0% 36.9% 58.7% 36.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gilles Muller Thomas Fabbiano
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1491 96.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 1488 100.0 -3.28 -2.21 0.908 49.0% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.06 2008 1533 103.8 -4.31 -0.06 0.843 46.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.04
20 2003 1451 96.0 +2.20 -4.69 1.068 50.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — 0.00 2009 1510 100.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 1600 126.5 +0.44 -0.24 1.013 50.1% +38 — — 44.2% -0.09 7–1 (88%) 1–6 (14%) — +0.52 2010 1553 109.4 +0.96 +1.43 0.491 42.2% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.19
22 2005 1728 137.8 +2.01 -3.76 0.888 48.6% -9 -178 -152 44.8% -0.60 6–5 (55%) 13–6 (68%) — -2.15 2011 1497 93.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 1535 118.4 -0.34 -3.26 0.890 48.8% +78 -6 -43 36.1% -0.67 1–4 (20%) 5–9 (36%) — +1.32 2012 1521 107.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 1578 104.7 +1.65 -2.99 0.958 49.5% -32 — — 30.8% -0.77 — 1–1 — +0.07 2013 1543 110.3 -3.11 +6.63 0.605 42.9% — — — 0.0% -2.33 — 0–1 — -0.16
25 2008 1673 122.4 +2.48 -2.87 0.833 48.5% +20 — — 45.7% -0.34 2–2 (50%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.16 2014 1468 96.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2009 1632 120.3 +1.24 -3.51 0.868 48.1% +68 — -102 40.0% -0.63 1–2 (33%) 5–2 (71%) — +0.29 2015 1602 120.4 -2.44 -1.27 0.687 42.9% — +25 — 0.0% -2.67 — 0–1 — -0.11
27 2010 1610 114.3 -1.03 -2.96 0.979 49.2% — — — 50.0% -0.10 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.27 2016 1614 119.3 -3.97 +0.55 0.888 47.8% +10 -40 — 33.3% -1.28 2–2 (50%) 0–4 (0%) — +0.75
28 2011 1798 145.1 +4.00 -3.93 0.931 49.6% 0 — -131 55.4% -0.09 2–5 (29%) 16–11 (59%) — -0.32 2017 1594 119.6 -4.29 -0.09 0.859 46.6% -7 — +27 28.6% -1.40 1–2 (33%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.33
29 2012 1840 148.8 +4.06 -4.34 0.979 49.8% +31 -246 -188 46.8% -0.15 10–7 (59%) 16–17 (48%) — -1.66 2018 1670 125.6 -3.67 +1.00 0.923 48.5% -120 -92 +67 42.9% -0.43 3–4 (43%) 3–6 (33%) — +0.17
30 2013 1678 116.7 +0.08 -5.24 0.738 45.9% +82 -165 — 26.1% -1.22 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.20 2019 1638 126.4 -2.10 -0.50 0.905 48.2% -70 -79 +175 41.9% -0.49 5–10 (33%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.38
31 2014 1738 140.5 +1.86 -1.97 0.832 47.2% +17 — — 44.4% -0.71 1–2 (33%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.77 2020 1593 101.2 -3.13 -2.21 0.679 40.4% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.05
32 2015 1894 162.5 +4.09 -2.33 1.019 50.8% -10 -311 -37 53.9% +0.26 11–8 (58%) 27–18 (60%) — -1.33 2021 1517 108.6 -1.11 +1.49 0.920 48.4% — — — 33.3% -0.56 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.21
33 2016 1968 159.7 +6.13 -2.52 1.108 51.4% -18 — -20 55.2% +0.31 10–8 (56%) 24–21 (53%) — -1.98 2022 1526 114.6 +1.39 -0.86 0.732 44.5% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.17
34 2017 1943 156.0 +4.71 -2.01 1.074 51.2% -84 -284 +133 59.7% +0.47 9–4 (69%) 19–10 (66%) — -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 1689 131.0 +1.83 -3.86 0.921 48.7% +16 -65 +271 39.0% -0.55 3–6 (33%) 9–10 (47%) — +1.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2076 149.8 +3.16 -2.99 0.969 49.8% +3 -180 -5 48.3% -0.13 65–58 (53%) 152–124 (55%) 106.3 -1.18 — 1749 121.9 -3.09 +0.20 0.876 47.5% -45 -61 +120 35.6% -0.90 11–22 (33%) 17–26 (40%) 92.2 +0.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.