H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Glenn Layendecker vs Dan Goldie H2H: 0-3
Dan Goldie holds a 3–0 lead over Glenn Layendecker in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Dan Goldie leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Dan Goldie won the 1990 New Haven second round 7-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 65
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 1990* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Dan Goldie | 7-6 6-4 6-3 | Glenn Layendecker | Match data |
| Jun 10, 1987* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Dan Goldie | 1-6 6-3 7-5 | Glenn Layendecker | Match data |
| Apr 2, 1987* | Chicago | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Dan Goldie | 6-4 6-3 | Glenn Layendecker | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glenn Layendecker | #804 | #48 | 447 | 1,733 | 77 | 104 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dan Goldie | #738 | #27 | 457 | 1,855 | 122 | 117 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Glenn Layendecker | Dan Goldie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #101 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #265 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #113 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1984 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #174 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #50 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1985 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #118 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #29 | 1,801 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1986 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #67 | 1,735 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1987 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #353 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #96 | 1,657 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1988 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #78 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #181 | 1,573 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1989 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #87 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1990 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #134 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1991 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #135 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1992 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #353 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |