H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Glenn Layendecker vs Danie Visser H2H: 0-1
Danie Visser holds a 1–0 lead over Glenn Layendecker in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Danie Visser leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Danie Visser won the 1986 Queen's Club third round 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 65
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 64
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 1986* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Danie Visser | 7-6 6-3 | Glenn Layendecker | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glenn Layendecker | #804 | #48 | 447 | 1,733 | 77 | 104 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Danie Visser | #749 | #59 | 191 | 1,709 | 92 | 129 | 41.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Glenn Layendecker | Danie Visser | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #93 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #138 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #72 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1984 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #174 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #145 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1985 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #118 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #83 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1986 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #136 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1987 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #353 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #143 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1988 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #78 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #141 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1989 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #87 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #197 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1990 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #134 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #405 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1991 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #135 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1992 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #353 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |