H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Glenn Layendecker vs Paul Mcnamee H2H: 1-0
Glenn Layendecker holds a 1–0 lead over Paul Mcnamee in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Glenn Layendecker leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Glenn Layendecker won the 1986 Sydney Indoor third round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 65
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 71
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 1986* | Sydney Indoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Glenn Layendecker | 6-1 6-3 | Paul Mcnamee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glenn Layendecker | #804 | #48 | 447 | 1,733 | 77 | 104 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Paul Mcnamee | #524 | #24 | 0 | 1,898 | 231 | 219 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Glenn Layendecker | Paul Mcnamee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #174 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #104 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1984 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #174 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #120 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1985 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #118 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1986 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 45–30 | 60.0% | #40 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1987 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #353 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #48 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1988 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #78 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,825 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1989 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #87 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #35 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1990 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #134 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,725 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1991 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #135 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #48 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1992 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #353 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,706 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #194 | 1,604 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #456 | 1,645 | 0 | 2 |