H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Go Soeda vs Prakash Amritraj H2H: 1-0
Go Soeda holds a 1–0 lead over Prakash Amritraj in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Go Soeda leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Go Soeda won the 2013 Chennai fourth round 7-6(2) 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 41
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
IND
Age 42
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2013* | Chennai | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Go Soeda | 7-6(2) 3-6 6-4 | Prakash Amritraj | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Go Soeda | #683 | #47 | 888 | 1,722 | 29 | 76 | 27.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Prakash Amritraj | #1,181 | #154 | 475 | 1,584 | 13 | 22 | 37.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Go Soeda | Prakash Amritraj | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #714 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #280 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #340 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #393 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #114 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #278 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #238 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #210 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #120 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #486 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #60 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2013 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #103 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #99 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #362 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2015 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #126 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2019 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #133 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |