H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Goran Ivanisevic vs Amos Mansdorf H2H: 3-1
Goran Ivanisevic holds a 3–1 lead over Amos Mansdorf in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Goran Ivanisevic leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Goran Ivanisevic won the 1994 Wimbledon third round 6-3 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 54
Left-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 60
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 1994* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Goran Ivanisevic | 6-3 7-5 6-4 | Amos Mansdorf | Match data |
| May 11, 1994* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Goran Ivanisevic | 6-4 7-6(2) | Amos Mansdorf | Match data |
| Feb 26, 1993* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Goran Ivanisevic | 6-4 5-7 7-6(5) | Amos Mansdorf | Match data |
| Jun 22, 1988* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Amos Mansdorf | 6-3 6-2 1-6 6-1 | Goran Ivanisevic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goran Ivanisevic | #395 | #2 | 3,572 | 2,124 | 561 | 316 | 64.0% | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 22 |
| Amos Mansdorf | #514 | #18 | 1,184 | 1,897 | 288 | 214 | 57.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Goran Ivanisevic | Amos Mansdorf | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #371 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #40 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #9 | 1,921 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #270 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,922 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #84 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 57–18 | 76.0% | #4 | 2,090 | 0 | 6 | 1986 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #37 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1993 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #7 | 2,031 | 0 | 9 | 1987 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #27 | 1,806 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1994 | 62–26 | 70.5% | #5 | 1,976 | 0 | 11 | 1988 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #26 | 1,853 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1995 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #10 | 1,911 | 0 | 12 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1996 | 76–24 | 76.0% | #4 | 2,001 | 0 | 17 | 1990 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #33 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1997 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #15 | 1,866 | 0 | 20 | 1991 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,738 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1998 | 44–28 | 61.1% | #12 | 1,873 | 0 | 21 | 1992 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #25 | 1,771 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1999 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,713 | 0 | 21 | 1993 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #25 | 1,787 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2000 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #129 | 1,596 | 0 | 21 | 1994 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #69 | 1,692 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2001 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #12 | 1,814 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2002 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #243 | 1,698 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #657 | 1,646 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2004 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #266 | 1,632 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |