H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Goran Ivanisevic vs Anders Jarryd H2H: 1-2
Anders Jarryd holds a 2–1 lead over Goran Ivanisevic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anders Jarryd leads 2–0 on carpet, while Goran Ivanisevic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anders Jarryd won the 1993 Rotterdam quarterfinal 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 54
Left-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 65
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 1993* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Anders Jarryd | 6-3 6-4 | Goran Ivanisevic | Match data |
| Jun 1, 1990* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Goran Ivanisevic | 6-3 6-0 6-2 | Anders Jarryd | Match data |
| Oct 21, 1988* | Frankfurt | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Anders Jarryd | 6-4 6-3 | Goran Ivanisevic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goran Ivanisevic | #395 | #2 | 3,572 | 2,124 | 561 | 316 | 64.0% | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 22 |
| Anders Jarryd | #1,316 | #5 | 957 | 2,059 | 371 | 251 | 59.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Goran Ivanisevic | Anders Jarryd | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #371 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #40 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #9 | 1,921 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #182 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,922 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #100 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 57–18 | 76.0% | #4 | 2,090 | 0 | 6 | 1982 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #58 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1993 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #7 | 2,031 | 0 | 9 | 1983 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #19 | 1,876 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1994 | 62–26 | 70.5% | #5 | 1,976 | 0 | 11 | 1984 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #6 | 1,989 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1995 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #10 | 1,911 | 0 | 12 | 1985 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #8 | 1,982 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1996 | 76–24 | 76.0% | #4 | 2,001 | 0 | 17 | 1986 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #19 | 1,883 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1997 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #15 | 1,866 | 0 | 20 | 1987 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,957 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1998 | 44–28 | 61.1% | #12 | 1,873 | 0 | 21 | 1988 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #32 | 1,820 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1999 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,713 | 0 | 21 | 1989 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #31 | 1,803 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2000 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #129 | 1,596 | 0 | 21 | 1990 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #73 | 1,807 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2001 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #12 | 1,814 | 1 | 22 | 1991 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #47 | 1,763 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2002 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #243 | 1,698 | 1 | 22 | 1992 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #150 | 1,593 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #657 | 1,646 | 1 | 22 | 1993 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #67 | 1,624 | 0 | 8 |
| 32 | 2004 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #266 | 1,632 | 1 | 22 | 1994 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,653 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #124 | 1,643 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #410 | 1,528 | 0 | 8 |