H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Goran Ivanisevic vs Justin Gimelstob H2H: 2-0
Goran Ivanisevic holds a 2–0 lead over Justin Gimelstob in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Goran Ivanisevic leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Goran Ivanisevic won the 2001 US Open second round 6-3 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 54
Left-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2001* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Goran Ivanisevic | 6-3 6-3 6-3 | Justin Gimelstob | Match data |
| Oct 9, 1998* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Goran Ivanisevic | 6-1 6-4 | Justin Gimelstob | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goran Ivanisevic | #395 | #2 | 3,572 | 2,124 | 561 | 316 | 64.0% | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 22 |
| Justin Gimelstob | #841 | #63 | 733 | 1,721 | 107 | 171 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Goran Ivanisevic | Justin Gimelstob | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #371 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #40 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #9 | 1,921 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,922 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 57–18 | 76.0% | #4 | 2,090 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #104 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #7 | 2,031 | 0 | 9 | 1998 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 62–26 | 70.5% | #5 | 1,976 | 0 | 11 | 1999 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #82 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #10 | 1,911 | 0 | 12 | 2000 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #97 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 76–24 | 76.0% | #4 | 2,001 | 0 | 17 | 2001 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1997 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #15 | 1,866 | 0 | 20 | 2002 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #106 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1998 | 44–28 | 61.1% | #12 | 1,873 | 0 | 21 | 2003 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #106 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1999 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,713 | 0 | 21 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #162 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2000 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #129 | 1,596 | 0 | 21 | 2005 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #104 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2001 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #12 | 1,814 | 1 | 22 | 2006 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #86 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2002 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #243 | 1,698 | 1 | 22 | 2007 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #556 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #657 | 1,646 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2004 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #266 | 1,632 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |