H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Goran Ivanisevic vs Ken Flach H2H: 0-1
Ken Flach holds a 1–0 lead over Goran Ivanisevic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ken Flach leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ken Flach won the 1989 Wimbledon second round 6-4 6-3 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 54
Left-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 1989* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Ken Flach | 6-4 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Goran Ivanisevic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goran Ivanisevic | #395 | #2 | 3,572 | 2,124 | 561 | 316 | 64.0% | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 22 |
| Ken Flach | #815 | #56 | 130 | 1,714 | 52 | 80 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Goran Ivanisevic | Ken Flach | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #371 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #40 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #9 | 1,921 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1991 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,922 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 57–18 | 76.0% | #4 | 2,090 | 0 | 6 | 1983 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #314 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #7 | 2,031 | 0 | 9 | 1984 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #155 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 62–26 | 70.5% | #5 | 1,976 | 0 | 11 | 1985 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #10 | 1,911 | 0 | 12 | 1986 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #223 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 76–24 | 76.0% | #4 | 2,001 | 0 | 17 | 1987 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #100 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1997 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #15 | 1,866 | 0 | 20 | 1988 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #203 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1998 | 44–28 | 61.1% | #12 | 1,873 | 0 | 21 | 1989 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #194 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1999 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,713 | 0 | 21 | 1990 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2000 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #129 | 1,596 | 0 | 21 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #572 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2001 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #12 | 1,814 | 1 | 22 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2002 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #243 | 1,698 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #657 | 1,646 | 1 | 22 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #514 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2004 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #266 | 1,632 | 1 | 22 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #835 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |