H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Goran Ivanisevic vs Leonardo Lavalle H2H: 4-0
Goran Ivanisevic holds a 4–0 lead over Leonardo Lavalle in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Goran Ivanisevic leads 2–0 on carpet and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Goran Ivanisevic won the 1992 US Open second round 7-5 7-6(7) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 54
Left-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
MEX
Age 59
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 1992* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Goran Ivanisevic | 7-5 7-6(7) 6-2 | Leonardo Lavalle | Match data |
| Oct 25, 1990* | Stockholm Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Goran Ivanisevic | 7-6 6-3 | Leonardo Lavalle | Match data |
| Oct 11, 1990* | Berlin | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Goran Ivanisevic | 7-6 7-5 | Leonardo Lavalle | Match data |
| Jan 25, 1989* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Goran Ivanisevic | 3-6 3-6 6-3 6-4 6-1 | Leonardo Lavalle | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goran Ivanisevic | #395 | #2 | 3,572 | 2,124 | 561 | 316 | 64.0% | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 22 |
| Leonardo Lavalle | #968 | #51 | 483 | 1,728 | 60 | 96 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Goran Ivanisevic | Leonardo Lavalle | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #371 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #40 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #87 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #9 | 1,921 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #105 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,922 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #224 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 57–18 | 76.0% | #4 | 2,090 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #64 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #7 | 2,031 | 0 | 9 | 1989 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #132 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 62–26 | 70.5% | #5 | 1,976 | 0 | 11 | 1990 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #10 | 1,911 | 0 | 12 | 1991 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #133 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1996 | 76–24 | 76.0% | #4 | 2,001 | 0 | 17 | 1992 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #99 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1997 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #15 | 1,866 | 0 | 20 | 1993 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #309 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1998 | 44–28 | 61.1% | #12 | 1,873 | 0 | 21 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1999 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,713 | 0 | 21 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #362 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2000 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #129 | 1,596 | 0 | 21 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #313 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2001 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #12 | 1,814 | 1 | 22 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #439 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2002 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #243 | 1,698 | 1 | 22 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #400 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #657 | 1,646 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2004 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #266 | 1,632 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |