H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Goran Ivanisevic vs Martin Damm Sr H2H: 5-0 (incl. walkovers)

Goran Ivanisevic vs Martin Damm Sr: 4–0 excluding walkovers; 5–0 including 1 walkover. Across 5 main-draw results including walkovers, Goran Ivanisevic leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Goran Ivanisevic won the 2002 Australian Open round of 128 4-6 7-5 7-6(4) 6-4.

CRO Age 55 Left-Handed 194 cm / 6'4"
H2H including walkovers
5 – 0
5 main-draw results

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Goran Ivanisevic #13 4-6 7-5 7-6(4) 6-4 Martin Damm Sr Match data Jan 16, 2002* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Goran Ivanisevic #4 (w/o) Martin Damm Sr Match data Oct 17, 1997* R16 Ostrava World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Goran Ivanisevic #7 6-2 6-2 Martin Damm Sr Match data Jun 13, 1996* R32 Queen's Club Championships World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Goran Ivanisevic #6 7-5 6-2 Martin Damm Sr Match data Mar 9, 1996* QF ABN AMRO Open World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Goran Ivanisevic #5 6-2 6-2 Martin Damm Sr Match data Apr 21, 1994* R32 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Goran Ivanisevic — #2 3,572 2,126 565 320 63.8% 1 2 1 7 11 22
Martin Damm Sr — — — 1,731 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Goran Ivanisevic Martin Damm Sr
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1988 1–4 20.0% #371 1,478 0 0 — — — — — — —
1989 29–23 55.8% #40 1,691 0 0 — — — — — — —
1990 46–22 67.6% #9 1,924 0 1 — — — — — — —
1991 35–21 62.5% #16 1,923 0 2 — — — — — — —
1992 61–19 76.2% #4 2,091 0 6 — — — — — — —
1993 50–21 70.4% #7 2,031 0 9 — — — — — — —
1994 62–26 70.5% #5 1,977 0 11 — — — — — — —
1995 41–22 65.1% #10 1,888 0 12 — — — — — — —
1996 76–25 75.2% #4 1,998 0 17 — — — — — — —
1997 51–20 71.8% #15 1,856 0 20 — — — — — — —
1998 44–28 61.1% #12 1,874 0 21 — — — — — — —
1999 22–26 45.8% #62 1,713 0 21 — — — — — — —
2000 11–22 33.3% #129 1,593 0 21 — — — — — — —
2001 28–21 57.1% #12 1,810 1 22 — — — — — — —
2002 4–7 36.4% #243 1,695 1 22 — — — — — — —
2003 0–3 0.0% #657 1,643 1 22 — — — — — — —
2004 4–10 28.6% #266 1,630 1 22 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Goran Ivanisevic Martin Damm Sr
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1988 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1989 11 8 19 57.9% 17 10 27 63.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1990 14 9 23 60.9% 18 5 23 78.3% 5 1 6 83.3% 9 7 16 56.3% 1991 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
1991 12 6 18 66.7% 9 8 17 52.9% 6 1 7 85.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 1992 6 8 14 42.9% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1992 16 5 21 76.2% 13 6 19 68.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 25 6 31 80.6% 1993 7 11 18 38.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
1993 12 8 20 60.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 21 6 27 77.8% 1994 7 12 19 36.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 7 11 36.4%
1994 10 8 18 55.6% 20 6 26 76.9% 7 2 9 77.8% 25 10 35 71.4% 1995 7 13 20 35.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
1995 11 8 19 57.9% 14 6 20 70.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 9 6 15 60.0% 1996 15 13 28 53.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 13 10 23 56.5%
1996 30 10 40 75.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 34 8 42 81.0% 1997 10 13 23 43.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
1997 21 11 32 65.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 21 4 25 84.0% 1998 10 14 24 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
1998 18 14 32 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 8 2 10 80.0% 15 7 22 68.2% 1999 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
1999 10 13 23 43.5% 1 6 7 14.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 2000 6 11 17 35.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
2000 9 15 24 37.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
2001 18 15 33 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
2002 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2004 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 197 142 339 58.1% 121 76 197 61.4% 70 27 97 72.2% 177 75 252 70.2% Career 74 107 181 40.9% 6 28 34 17.6% 22 24 46 47.8% 51 49 100 51.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Goran Ivanisevic Martin Damm Sr
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1988 1478 107.3 — — — — +58 — — 23.1% -1.31 0–1 0–2 — +0.30 1989 1492 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.08
1989 1692 142.2 — — — — -69 +43 — 51.7% +0.24 12–6 (67%) 7–6 (54%) 112.3 +0.16 1990 1478 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.15
1990 1925 154.6 — — — — -105 +24 -189 63.7% +0.84 11–8 (58%) 17–16 (52%) 104.5 -2.30 1991 1504 104.7 — — — — +57 — — 57.1% +0.57 1–0 0–1 — +0.21
1991 1924 149.4 +5.80 -0.90 1.118 51.4% -1 -71 -149 62.3% +0.60 6–7 (46%) 16–13 (55%) 101.0 +1.26 1992 1546 125.4 — — — — +65 -88 — 35.1% -0.91 4–1 (80%) 2–5 (29%) 103.3 +0.26
1992 2092 163.5 +7.53 +0.27 1.208 52.7% +13 -188 -169 68.4% +0.87 8–8 (50%) 28–11 (72%) 106.3 -3.70 1993 1647 128.4 — — — — +28 -196 — 44.8% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 8–5 (62%) 105.4 +0.61
1993 2032 156.9 +6.92 +0.15 1.201 52.7% +10 -79 -143 66.9% +0.83 9–5 (64%) 24–13 (65%) 103.6 -1.46 1994 1630 133.5 — — — — -23 -172 +21 44.4% -0.32 3–13 (19%) 9–10 (47%) 92.4 -0.61
1994 1977 162.0 +7.19 +0.07 1.185 52.6% -3 +32 +51 64.9% +0.86 17–7 (71%) 25–18 (58%) 105.0 -2.60 1995 1619 133.0 — — — — +8 — — 42.3% -0.55 9–8 (53%) 11–11 (50%) 102.9 -0.27
1995 1888 155.4 +5.62 -0.88 1.146 52.4% -15 +111 +129 64.3% +0.64 11–11 (50%) 18–13 (58%) 97.4 +0.19 1996 1709 139.5 — — — — +35 — -23 47.9% -0.08 13–8 (62%) 13–18 (42%) 102.9 +1.26
1996 1998 162.3 +7.95 -0.46 1.236 53.2% +40 -83 +56 69.8% +1.01 17–6 (74%) 34–19 (64%) 108.5 -1.18 1997 1694 135.4 — — — — +35 -281 +7 48.3% -0.18 8–7 (53%) 16–10 (62%) 105.2 +0.62
1997 1856 144.9 +5.72 -1.92 1.113 51.8% +37 +37 +144 63.5% +0.79 19–5 (79%) 25–20 (56%) 101.3 +1.07 1998 1649 132.2 — — — — +16 — +23 42.9% -0.50 7–7 (50%) 8–11 (42%) 98.6 -0.31
1998 1874 155.0 +3.70 -1.02 1.043 50.9% -6 -59 +206 60.3% +0.51 10–13 (43%) 30–23 (57%) 99.1 -0.71 1999 1578 123.5 — — — — +27 -177 +52 39.1% -0.78 1–7 (13%) 3–5 (38%) 90.9 -0.57
1999 1714 132.1 +2.12 -4.73 0.894 48.4% +11 -33 +317 46.9% -0.26 12–10 (55%) 11–10 (52%) 97.9 +0.73 2000 1615 127.5 — — — — -72 -159 +102 44.2% -0.34 7–3 (70%) 6–9 (40%) 105.2 +0.30
2000 1594 130.7 +2.10 -1.93 0.980 49.9% +26 +10 +418 39.5% -0.66 5–9 (36%) 3–9 (25%) 90.7 -1.16 2001 1514 96.3 — — — — — — +91 15.0% -1.90 — 0–2 — +0.77
2001 1810 144.7 +5.34 -4.11 0.982 50.0% -79 — +306 54.8% +0.19 9–6 (60%) 14–13 (52%) 105.8 -1.32 2002 1525 111.4 — — — — +15 — — 37.5% -0.75 — 1–1 — -0.13
2002 1695 115.5 +0.35 -1.60 0.969 49.1% -55 — — 44.0% -0.20 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 100.1 +0.87 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2003 1644 102.4 -2.78 -2.11 0.625 42.0% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2004 1631 117.1 +1.50 -5.51 0.740 46.2% -17 -111 +403 37.8% -1.08 3–4 (43%) 7–2 (78%) 101.6 -0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 2126 157.5 +5.67 -1.23 1.105 51.6% -4 -18 +101 60.7% +0.55 151–107 (59%) 261–191 (58%) 106.2 -1.18 Career 1732 136.6 — — — — +17 -170 +36 43.3% -0.43 59–60 (50%) 77–88 (47%) 101.6 +0.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.