H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Goran Ivanisevic vs Nicolas Kiefer H2H: 2-1
Goran Ivanisevic holds a 2–1 lead over Nicolas Kiefer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Goran Ivanisevic leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nicolas Kiefer won the 2002 Dubai third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 54
Left-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 49
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2002* | Dubai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Nicolas Kiefer | 6-3 6-4 | Goran Ivanisevic | Match data |
| Feb 1, 2001* | Milan | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Goran Ivanisevic | 2-6 6-2 6-3 | Nicolas Kiefer | Match data |
| Aug 21, 1998* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Goran Ivanisevic | 6-3 7-5 | Nicolas Kiefer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goran Ivanisevic | #395 | #2 | 3,572 | 2,124 | 561 | 316 | 64.0% | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 22 |
| Nicolas Kiefer | #720 | #4 | 2,447 | 1,984 | 343 | 252 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Goran Ivanisevic | Nicolas Kiefer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #371 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1198 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1989 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #40 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #206 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #9 | 1,921 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #128 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,922 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #32 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1992 | 57–18 | 76.0% | #4 | 2,090 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1993 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #7 | 2,031 | 0 | 9 | 1999 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #6 | 1,921 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1994 | 62–26 | 70.5% | #5 | 1,976 | 0 | 11 | 2000 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,921 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1995 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #10 | 1,911 | 0 | 12 | 2001 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #42 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1996 | 76–24 | 76.0% | #4 | 2,001 | 0 | 17 | 2002 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #72 | 1,718 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1997 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #15 | 1,866 | 0 | 20 | 2003 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,727 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1998 | 44–28 | 61.1% | #12 | 1,873 | 0 | 21 | 2004 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #21 | 1,897 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1999 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,713 | 0 | 21 | 2005 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #22 | 1,854 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2000 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #129 | 1,596 | 0 | 21 | 2006 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #48 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2001 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #12 | 1,814 | 1 | 22 | 2007 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #49 | 1,893 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2002 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #243 | 1,698 | 1 | 22 | 2008 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #38 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #657 | 1,646 | 1 | 22 | 2009 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #116 | 1,757 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2004 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #266 | 1,632 | 1 | 22 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #722 | 1,717 | 0 | 6 |