H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Goran Ivanisevic vs Sargis Sargsian H2H: 2-0
Goran Ivanisevic holds a 2–0 lead over Sargis Sargsian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Goran Ivanisevic leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Goran Ivanisevic won the 2001 Memphis second round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 54
Left-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ARM
Age 53
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2001* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Goran Ivanisevic | 6-2 6-4 | Sargis Sargsian | Match data |
| Aug 6, 1998* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Goran Ivanisevic | 6-3 6-2 | Sargis Sargsian | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goran Ivanisevic | #395 | #2 | 3,572 | 2,124 | 561 | 316 | 64.0% | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 22 |
| Sargis Sargsian | #1,525 | #38 | 978 | 1,811 | 155 | 205 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Goran Ivanisevic | Sargis Sargsian | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #371 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #40 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #9 | 1,921 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1991 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,922 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1992 | 57–18 | 76.0% | #4 | 2,090 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #615 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #7 | 2,031 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1994 | 62–26 | 70.5% | #5 | 1,976 | 0 | 11 | 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #220 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #10 | 1,911 | 0 | 12 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #104 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 76–24 | 76.0% | #4 | 2,001 | 0 | 17 | 1997 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #69 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1997 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #15 | 1,866 | 0 | 20 | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1998 | 44–28 | 61.1% | #12 | 1,873 | 0 | 21 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #59 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1999 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,713 | 0 | 21 | 2000 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #94 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2000 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #129 | 1,596 | 0 | 21 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2001 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #12 | 1,814 | 1 | 22 | 2002 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #103 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2002 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #243 | 1,698 | 1 | 22 | 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #657 | 1,646 | 1 | 22 | 2004 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #75 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2004 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #266 | 1,632 | 1 | 22 | 2005 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #294 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |