H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Goran Prpic vs Diego Perez H2H: 1-1
Goran Prpic and Diego Perez are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Goran Prpic won the 1990 Umag fourth round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 62
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
URU
Age 64
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 1990* | Umag | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Goran Prpic | 6-2 6-0 | Diego Perez | Match data |
| Sep 14, 1985* | Palermo | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Diego Perez | 6-2 6-3 | Goran Prpic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goran Prpic | #1,349 | #16 | 1,192 | 1,948 | 114 | 105 | 52.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Diego Perez | #1,373 | #27 | 389 | 1,830 | 195 | 213 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Goran Prpic | Diego Perez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #579 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #94 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #100 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #139 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #51 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #870 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #52 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #55 | 1,779 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1988 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #61 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1989 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #28 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #116 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1990 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #55 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #142 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1991 | 36–28 | 56.2% | #18 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #112 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1992 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #132 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1993 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #115 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #176 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #128 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–13 | 13.3% | #253 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1269 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #661 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 |