H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Graham Stilwell vs Frank Froehling H2H: 0-2
Frank Froehling holds a 2–0 lead over Graham Stilwell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Frank Froehling leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Frank Froehling won the 1972 Miami Wct third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 1972* | Miami Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Frank Froehling | 6-4 6-3 | Graham Stilwell | Match data |
| Apr 23, 1971* | Houston | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Frank Froehling | 6-4 6-4 | Graham Stilwell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Graham Stilwell | #62 | #62 | 0 | 1,734 | 97 | 181 | 34.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Frank Froehling | #282 | #67 | 0 | 1,840 | 83 | 117 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Graham Stilwell | Frank Froehling | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 1968 | 19–15 | 55.9% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1969 | 11–6 | 64.7% | — | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1970 | 15–28 | 34.9% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1971 | 9–32 | 22.0% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1972 | 10–27 | 27.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1973 | 15–33 | 31.2% | #109 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1974 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #128 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1975 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #83 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 44–31 | 58.7% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 13–35 | 27.1% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 15–27 | 35.7% | #72 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #171 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |