H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Grant Connell vs Dan Goldie H2H: 2-1
Grant Connell holds a 2–1 lead over Dan Goldie in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Grant Connell leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Grant Connell won the 1990 Hong Kong fourth round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 60
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 1990* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Grant Connell | 6-3 6-4 | Dan Goldie | Match data |
| Feb 14, 1990* | Toronto Indoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | Grant Connell | 6-4 2-6 6-3 | Dan Goldie | Match data |
| Feb 25, 1988* | Philadelphia | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Dan Goldie | 3-6 7-5 6-4 | Grant Connell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grant Connell | #1,367 | #67 | 517 | 1,754 | 66 | 96 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dan Goldie | #738 | #27 | 457 | 1,855 | 122 | 117 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Grant Connell | Dan Goldie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #570 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #101 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #123 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #265 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #134 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #113 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #94 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #50 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1990 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #92 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #29 | 1,801 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1991 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #79 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #67 | 1,735 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1992 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #186 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #96 | 1,657 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #946 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #181 | 1,573 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1994 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #713 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |