H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Grant Connell vs Joakim Nystrom H2H: 0-1
Joakim Nystrom holds a 1–0 lead over Grant Connell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Joakim Nystrom leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Joakim Nystrom won the 1984 Montreal / Toronto second round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 60
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 63
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 1984* | Montreal / Toronto | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Joakim Nystrom | 6-4 6-3 | Grant Connell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grant Connell | #1,367 | #67 | 517 | 1,754 | 66 | 96 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Joakim Nystrom | #977 | #7 | 54 | 2,114 | 257 | 136 | 65.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Grant Connell | Joakim Nystrom | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #69 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #570 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #98 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 26–12 | 68.4% | #27 | 1,868 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #123 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #11 | 1,967 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #134 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #11 | 1,925 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1989 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #94 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 55–17 | 76.4% | #7 | 1,912 | 0 | 12 |
| 24 | 1990 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #92 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #16 | 1,876 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 1991 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #79 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #69 | 1,729 | 0 | 13 |
| 26 | 1992 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #186 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #331 | 1,607 | 0 | 13 |
| 27 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #946 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1994 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #713 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |