H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Grant Connell vs John Fitzgerald H2H: 1-2
John Fitzgerald holds a 2–1 lead over Grant Connell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, John Fitzgerald leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, John Fitzgerald won the 1992 Singapore third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 60
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 65
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 1992* | Singapore | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | John Fitzgerald | 6-4 6-3 | Grant Connell | Match data |
| Mar 17, 1990* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Grant Connell | 6-4 6-4 | John Fitzgerald | Match data |
| Aug 10, 1988* | Montreal / Toronto | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | John Fitzgerald | 3-6 6-2 7-6 | Grant Connell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grant Connell | #1,367 | #67 | 517 | 1,754 | 66 | 96 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| John Fitzgerald | #765 | #25 | 321 | 1,857 | 230 | 221 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Grant Connell | John Fitzgerald | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #305 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #570 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #60 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #123 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #134 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #43 | 1,790 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1989 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #94 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #37 | 1,786 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1990 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #92 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #91 | 1,665 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1991 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #79 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #102 | 1,654 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1992 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #186 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #946 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #25 | 1,778 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1994 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #117 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #713 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #188 | 1,587 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #205 | 1,610 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #166 | 1,618 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #298 | 1,582 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #792 | 1,575 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,570 | 0 | 6 |