H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Grant Connell vs Kelly Evernden H2H: 2-0
Grant Connell holds a 2–0 lead over Kelly Evernden in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Grant Connell leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Grant Connell won the 1992 Auckland quarterfinal 6-4 7-6(8).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 60
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
NZL
Age 64
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 1992* | Auckland | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Grant Connell | 6-4 7-6(8) | Kelly Evernden | Match data |
| Jul 25, 1990* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Grant Connell | 6-1 4-6 7-6 | Kelly Evernden | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grant Connell | #1,367 | #67 | 517 | 1,754 | 66 | 96 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kelly Evernden | #1,218 | #31 | 535 | 1,853 | 121 | 129 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Grant Connell | Kelly Evernden | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #403 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #570 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #123 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #576 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #134 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1989 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #94 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #86 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #92 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #289 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #79 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #36 | 1,793 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1992 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #186 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #119 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #946 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #38 | 1,707 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1994 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #97 | 1,615 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #713 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #193 | 1,512 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #207 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #447 | 1,580 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1198 | 1,570 | 0 | 3 |