H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Grant Connell vs Ken Flach H2H: 1-0
Grant Connell holds a 1–0 lead over Ken Flach in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Grant Connell leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Grant Connell won the 1990 Indianapolis second round 7-5 1-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 60
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 1990* | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Grant Connell | 7-5 1-6 6-1 | Ken Flach | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grant Connell | #1,367 | #67 | 517 | 1,754 | 66 | 96 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ken Flach | #815 | #56 | 130 | 1,714 | 52 | 80 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Grant Connell | Ken Flach | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #570 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #314 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #123 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #155 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #134 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #94 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #223 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #92 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #100 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #79 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #203 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #186 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #194 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #946 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #572 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #713 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #514 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #835 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |