H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Grant Connell vs Martin Wostenholme H2H: 1-0
Grant Connell holds a 1–0 lead over Martin Wostenholme in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Grant Connell leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Grant Connell won the 1991 Washington second round 6-7(3) 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 60
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 63
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 1991* | Washington | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Grant Connell | 6-7(3) 6-4 6-4 | Martin Wostenholme | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grant Connell | #1,367 | #67 | 517 | 1,754 | 66 | 96 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Martin Wostenholme | #1,171 | #84 | 265 | 1,607 | 44 | 79 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Grant Connell | Martin Wostenholme | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #579 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #570 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #329 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #123 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #186 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #134 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #94 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #190 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #92 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #251 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #79 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #293 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #186 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #946 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #156 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #153 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #713 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |