H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Grant Connell vs Peter Lundgren H2H: 0-1
Peter Lundgren holds a 1–0 lead over Grant Connell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Peter Lundgren leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Peter Lundgren won the 1992 Seoul third round 3-6 6-1 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 60
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 1992* | Seoul | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Peter Lundgren | 3-6 6-1 7-6(4) | Grant Connell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grant Connell | #1,367 | #67 | 517 | 1,754 | 66 | 96 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Peter Lundgren | #472 | #25 | 619 | 1,867 | 119 | 136 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Grant Connell | Peter Lundgren | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #570 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #31 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #123 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #98 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #134 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,837 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1989 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #94 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #66 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1990 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #92 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #71 | 1,701 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1991 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #79 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,711 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1992 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #186 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #138 | 1,608 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #946 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #213 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1994 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,566 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #713 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #386 | 1,531 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #384 | 1,532 | 0 | 3 |