H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Grant Stafford vs Bryan Shelton H2H: 1-0
Grant Stafford holds a 1–0 lead over Bryan Shelton in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Grant Stafford leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Grant Stafford won the 1994 Auckland third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 1994* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Grant Stafford | 6-2 6-1 | Bryan Shelton | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grant Stafford | #1,161 | #53 | 750 | 1,799 | 83 | 111 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bryan Shelton | #1,195 | #55 | 253 | 1,725 | 101 | 136 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Grant Stafford | Bryan Shelton | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #172 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #191 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1993 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #86 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1994 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #168 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #288 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #123 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #83 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #72 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #74 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #100 | 1,627 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1998 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #163 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #97 | 1,557 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #475 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #85 | 1,639 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #435 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,532 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #190 | 1,557 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #283 | 1,561 | 0 | 2 |