H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Grant Stafford vs Neville Godwin H2H: 1-1

Grant Stafford and Neville Godwin are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Neville Godwin leads 1–0 on grass, while Grant Stafford leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Grant Stafford won the 1997 Sydney Outdoor third round 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Grant Stafford
RSA Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Neville Godwin
RSA Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 9, 1997* Sydney Outdoor ATP 250 R32 Hard Grant Stafford #82 6-4 6-1 Neville Godwin #110 Match data
Jun 28, 1996* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Neville Godwin #223 6-4 7-5 6-2 Grant Stafford #120 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Grant Stafford #1,161 #53 750 1,799 83 111 42.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Neville Godwin #812 #90 515 1,670 34 51 40.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Grant Stafford Neville Godwin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1992 0–1 0.0% #487 1,484 0 0
19 1990 0–1 0.0% #264 1,492 0 0 1994 0–1 0.0% #275 1,468 0 0
20 1991 5–6 45.5% #172 1,553 0 0 1995 2–3 40.0% #208 1,475 0 0
21 1992 4–4 50.0% #191 1,636 0 0 1996 7–6 53.8% #111 1,594 0 0
22 1993 17–14 54.8% #86 1,707 0 0 1997 7–13 35.0% #180 1,548 0 0
23 1994 11–21 34.4% #168 1,555 0 0 1998 7–7 50.0% #150 1,581 0 0
24 1995 2–7 22.2% #288 1,527 0 0 1999 1–2 33.3% #210 1,568 0 0
25 1996 10–13 43.5% #83 1,562 0 0 2000 3–4 42.9% #123 1,616 0 0
26 1997 21–20 51.2% #74 1,655 0 0 2001 5–7 41.7% #128 1,579 0 1
27 1998 12–21 36.4% #163 1,563 0 0 2002 2–7 22.2% #207 1,489 0 1
28 1999 0–3 0.0% #475 1,534 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2000 1–1 50.0% #435 1,591 0 0 — — — — — — —