H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Greg Holmes vs Bud Schultz H2H: 1-1

Greg Holmes and Bud Schultz are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Greg Holmes leads 1–0 on grass, while Bud Schultz leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bud Schultz won the 1985 Cleveland round of 16 6-4 3-6 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Greg Holmes
USA Age 63 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Bud Schultz
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bud Schultz #74 6-4 3-6 7-6 Greg Holmes #24 Match data Aug 16, 1985* R16 Cleveland ATP 250 Hard
Greg Holmes #28 6-4 6-7 6-2 6-3 Bud Schultz #97 Match data Jun 28, 1985* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Greg Holmes #1,113 #22 50 1,849 82 92 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bud Schultz #1,057 #40 0 1,774 47 54 46.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Holmes Bud Schultz
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1983 3–7 30.0% #308 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1984 16–14 53.3% #59 1,685 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1985 25–19 56.8% #27 1,701 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1986 16–17 48.5% #76 1,675 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1987 11–16 40.7% #117 1,613 0 0 1983 0–2 0.0% — 1,486 0 0
24 1988 8–14 36.4% #197 1,605 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1989 3–4 42.9% #347 1,641 0 0 1985 26–18 59.1% #43 1,742 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 1986 15–24 38.5% #114 1,626 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 1987 4–8 33.3% #233 1,589 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 1988 2–2 50.0% #527 1,591 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Greg Holmes Bud Schultz
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1982 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1983 3 2 5 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1984 12 8 20 60.0% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1985 16 8 24 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1986 11 10 21 52.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1987 9 8 17 52.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1983 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1988 7 11 18 38.9% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1989 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1985 13 8 21 61.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 4 11 63.6% 5 4 9 55.6%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 9 11 20 45.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 7 9 22.2%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 59 49 108 54.6% 1 8 9 11.1% 11 16 27 40.7% 11 19 30 36.7% — 26 26 52 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 13 10 23 56.5% 7 13 20 35.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Greg Holmes Bud Schultz
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1982 1494 102.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1983 1530 124.6 — — — — +80 — — 46.9% -0.03 0–4 (0%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1984 1685 127.0 — — — — +19 — -156 51.9% +0.16 5–4 (56%) 8–6 (57%) — +1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1985 1702 138.5 — — — — +68 -188 -161 54.1% +0.36 8–7 (53%) 9–12 (43%) — +0.87 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1986 1676 144.9 — — — — +13 — -89 50.6% +0.31 5–6 (45%) 7–12 (37%) — -1.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1987 1614 133.4 — — — — +68 -107 -60 40.3% -0.49 6–5 (55%) 5–11 (31%) — -1.27 1983 1487 105.7 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.14
24 1988 1606 132.3 — — — — +28 — -48 34.7% -0.80 2–0 4–4 (50%) — -1.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1989 1642 112.2 — — — — +2 — -42 45.5% -0.59 1–1 3–1 (75%) — -0.33 1985 1743 130.9 — — — — -14 -249 -102 55.0% +0.04 10–4 (71%) 18–8 (69%) — +1.24
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1626 129.5 — — — — -11 — +23 39.2% -0.81 10–8 (56%) 7–10 (41%) — +0.25
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1590 114.0 — — — — -37 — +55 46.3% +0.02 2–7 (22%) 1–6 (14%) — +0.10
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1591 108.3 — — — — -43 — — 62.5% +1.37 1–1 0–1 — +0.16
Career — 1849 141.1 — — — — +42 -148 -108 47.7% -0.03 27–27 (50%) 37–49 (43%) 95.0 -1.50 — 1775 129.9 — — — — -17 -249 -31 47.2% -0.28 23–21 (52%) 26–25 (51%) 102.7 +1.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.