H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Greg Holmes vs John Frawley H2H: 1-1

Greg Holmes and John Frawley are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, John Frawley leads 1–0 on clay, while Greg Holmes leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, John Frawley won the 1985 Roland Garros round of 64 1-6 6-3 3-6 6-3 6-2.

USA Age 63 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 1
2 main-draw meetings
AUS Age 61 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
John Frawley 1-6 6-3 3-6 6-3 6-2 Greg Holmes #26 Match data May 31, 1985* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Greg Holmes #30 6-7 7-6 6-0 John Frawley Match data Feb 6, 1985* R64 Miami Open ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Greg Holmes #1,113 #22 50 1,849 82 92 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
John Frawley 1,834 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Holmes John Frawley
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1982 0–1 0.0% 1,493 0 0
19 1983 3–7 30.0% #308 1,530 0 0
20 1984 16–14 53.3% #59 1,685 0 0
21 1985 25–19 56.8% #27 1,701 0 0
22 1986 16–17 48.5% #76 1,675 0 0
23 1987 11–16 40.7% #117 1,613 0 0
24 1988 8–14 36.4% #197 1,605 0 0
25 1989 3–4 42.9% #347 1,641 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Greg Holmes John Frawley
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
18 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
19 1983 3 2 5 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 4 5 9 44.4% 5 7 12 41.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
20 1984 12 8 20 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1985 16 8 24 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1987 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 1986 11 10 21 52.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1988 24 17 41 58.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1987 9 8 17 52.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1989 1 10 11 9.1% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 1988 7 11 18 38.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1989 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
Career 59 49 108 54.6% 1 8 9 11.1% 11 16 27 40.7% 11 19 30 36.7% 37 40 77 48.1% 13 14 27 48.1% 12 19 31 38.7% 5 10 15 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Greg Holmes John Frawley
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1982 1498 117.6 +69 -4 29.4% -1.82 1–2 (33%) 1–1 -0.57
17 1983 1458 107.7 +83 -2 34.8% -1.09 0–3 (0%) 2–0 +0.76
18 1982 1494 102.8 0.0% -2.50 -0.03 1984 1654 130.9 -37 -1 -122 55.6% +0.50 3–2 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 102.8 +2.33
19 1983 1530 124.6 +80 46.9% -0.03 0–4 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 94.1 +0.08 1985 1647 127.7 -70 +1 -45 46.1% -0.25 5–8 (38%) 6–7 (46%) 98.1 +0.15
20 1984 1685 127.0 +19 -156 51.9% +0.16 5–4 (56%) 8–6 (57%) 105.0 +1.36
21 1985 1702 138.5 +68 -188 -161 54.1% +0.36 8–7 (53%) 9–12 (43%) 96.6 +0.87 1987 1702 119.0 -91 -89 52.4% +0.24 1–1 1–2 (33%) -0.65
22 1986 1676 144.9 +13 -89 50.6% +0.31 5–6 (45%) 7–12 (37%) 94.8 -1.35 1988 1738 138.5 -14 51.3% +0.03 7–6 (54%) 9–10 (47%) 100.0 -0.66
23 1987 1614 133.4 +68 -107 -60 40.3% -0.49 6–5 (55%) 5–11 (31%) 95.4 -1.27 1989 1536 106.2 -2 +103 28.6% -1.38 0–3 (0%) 3–3 (50%) 94.5 +0.38
24 1988 1606 132.3 +28 -48 34.7% -0.80 2–0 4–4 (50%) -1.94
25 1989 1642 112.2 +2 -42 45.5% -0.59 1–1 3–1 (75%) -0.33
Career 1849 141.1 +42 -148 -108 47.7% -0.03 27–27 (50%) 37–49 (43%) 95.0 -1.50 1835 132.6 -21 +22 -66 46.5% -0.24 17–25 (40%) 27–27 (50%) 95.8 +1.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.