H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Albert Costa H2H: 3-2

Greg Rusedski holds a 3–2 lead over Albert Costa in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Greg Rusedski leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Albert Costa leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Albert Costa won the 2004 Australian Open first round 6-4 6-3 6-4.

GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
ESP Age 51 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 21, 2004* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Albert Costa #27 6-4 6-3 6-4 Greg Rusedski #104 Match data
Nov 4, 1999* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Albert Costa #24 7-6(7) (ret.) Greg Rusedski #6 Match data
Nov 23, 1998 Tour Finals ATP Finals RR Hard Greg Rusedski #11 7-6(5) 6-1 Albert Costa #14 Match data
Aug 15, 1997* New Haven ATP 250 R16 Hard Greg Rusedski #25 6-3 7-6(5) Albert Costa #15 Match data
Jun 20, 1996* Nottingham ATP 250 R32 Grass Greg Rusedski #76 6-1 6-4 Albert Costa #17 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,049 415 276 60.1% 0 1 1 0 13 15
Albert Costa #669 #6 2,385 1,996 368 263 58.3% 1 1 0 0 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Albert Costa
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 1993 2–2 50.0% #221 1,522 0 0
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 1994 15–18 45.5% #52 1,583 0 0
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,681 0 1 1995 33–22 60.0% #24 1,758 0 1
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1996 46–26 63.9% #13 1,750 0 4
22 1996 36–25 59.0% #48 1,805 0 3 1997 40–20 66.7% #19 1,830 0 6
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,950 0 5 1998 47–26 64.4% #14 1,759 0 8
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 1999 40–22 64.5% #18 1,810 0 11
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,976 0 9 2000 29–22 56.9% #26 1,779 0 11
26 2000 19–19 50.0% #69 1,802 0 9 2001 27–22 55.1% #40 1,807 0 11
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,807 0 10 2002 32–22 59.3% #9 1,796 1 12
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,904 0 12 2003 23–20 53.5% #25 1,767 1 12
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,825 0 13 2004 19–22 46.3% #56 1,668 1 12
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,819 0 14 2005 13–17 43.3% #116 1,619 1 12
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,780 0 15 2006 2–2 50.0% #623 1,631 1 12
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,638 0 15