H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Greg Rusedski vs Arvind Parmar H2H: 2-0
Greg Rusedski holds a 2–0 lead over Arvind Parmar in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Greg Rusedski leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 2001 Queen's Club second round 7-6(5) 1-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 52
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 48
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2001* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Greg Rusedski | 7-6(5) 1-6 6-2 | Arvind Parmar | Match data |
| Jun 25, 1999* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Greg Rusedski | 6-3 6-4 7-6(3) | Arvind Parmar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greg Rusedski | #944 | #4 | 3,094 | 2,049 | 415 | 276 | 60.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 15 |
| Arvind Parmar | #1,507 | #137 | 282 | 1,604 | 14 | 26 | 35.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Greg Rusedski | Arvind Parmar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1992 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #161 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 21–29 | 42.0% | #114 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #250 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #48 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #154 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #6 | 1,950 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #210 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #9 | 2,011 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #170 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #14 | 1,976 | 0 | 9 | 2003 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #166 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,802 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #183 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #31 | 1,807 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2002 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #31 | 1,904 | 0 | 12 | 2006 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #331 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #119 | 1,825 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #46 | 1,819 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #37 | 1,780 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2006 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #191 | 1,638 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |