H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Greg Rusedski vs Bohdan Ulihrach H2H: 3-1
Greg Rusedski holds a 3–1 lead over Bohdan Ulihrach in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Greg Rusedski leads 2–0 on carpet, while Bohdan Ulihrach leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 2002 Milan fourth round 7-6(5) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 52
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2002* | Milan | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Greg Rusedski | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Bohdan Ulihrach | Match data |
| Sep 4, 1998* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Greg Rusedski | 4-6 6-3 4-6 6-2 7-5 | Bohdan Ulihrach | Match data |
| May 13, 1998* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Bohdan Ulihrach | 7-5 7-6(8) | Greg Rusedski | Match data |
| Nov 1, 1997* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Carpet | Greg Rusedski | 7-5 6-3 | Bohdan Ulihrach | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greg Rusedski | #944 | #4 | 3,094 | 2,049 | 415 | 276 | 60.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 15 |
| Bohdan Ulihrach | #805 | #22 | 1,399 | 1,841 | 218 | 236 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Greg Rusedski | Bohdan Ulihrach | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1992 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #161 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 21–29 | 42.0% | #114 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #28 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1995 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1996 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #48 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #34 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1997 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #6 | 1,950 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 31–28 | 52.5% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1998 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #9 | 2,011 | 0 | 7 | 1999 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #107 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1999 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #14 | 1,976 | 0 | 9 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #76 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2000 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,802 | 0 | 9 | 2001 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #32 | 1,772 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2001 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #31 | 1,807 | 0 | 10 | 2002 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #75 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2002 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #31 | 1,904 | 0 | 12 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2003 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #119 | 1,825 | 0 | 13 | 2004 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #86 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2004 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #46 | 1,819 | 0 | 14 | 2005 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #285 | 1,559 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2005 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #37 | 1,780 | 0 | 15 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,556 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2006 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #191 | 1,638 | 0 | 15 | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |