H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Boris Becker H2H: 0-3

Boris Becker holds a 3–0 lead over Greg Rusedski in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Boris Becker leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Boris Becker won the 1998 Monte Carlo Masters third round 6-4 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Greg Rusedski
GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Boris Becker
GER Age 58 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 23, 1998* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Boris Becker #66 6-4 3-6 6-3 Greg Rusedski #5 Match data
Oct 24, 1996* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Boris Becker #6 6-4 6-4 Greg Rusedski #56 Match data
Jan 17, 1996* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Boris Becker #4 6-4 3-6 4-6 6-3 6-3 Greg Rusedski #33 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,049 415 276 60.1% 0 1 1 0 13 15
Boris Becker #257 #1 4,297 2,266 670 219 75.4% 6 9 4 0 30 49

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Boris Becker
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,497 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1984 11–11 50.0% #66 1,651 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1985 50–18 73.5% #6 2,066 1 3
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 1986 65–13 83.3% #2 2,229 2 9
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 1987 50–15 76.9% #5 2,040 2 12
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,681 0 1 1988 50–9 84.7% #4 2,180 2 19
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1989 54–8 87.1% #2 2,232 4 24
22 1996 36–25 59.0% #48 1,805 0 3 1990 69–14 83.1% #2 2,206 4 29
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,950 0 5 1991 46–13 78.0% #3 2,112 5 31
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 1992 48–15 76.2% #5 2,145 5 36
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,976 0 9 1993 42–22 65.6% #11 1,885 5 38
26 2000 19–19 50.0% #69 1,802 0 9 1994 50–17 74.6% #3 2,052 5 42
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,807 0 10 1995 51–18 73.9% #4 2,043 5 44
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,904 0 12 1996 42–14 75.0% #6 2,083 6 49
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,825 0 13 1997 17–13 56.7% #62 1,914 6 49
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,819 0 14 1998 15–11 57.7% #69 1,874 6 49
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,780 0 15 1999 10–7 58.8% #131 1,863 6 49
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,638 0 15 — — — — — — —