H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Carlos Moya H2H: 2-2

Greg Rusedski and Carlos Moya are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Greg Rusedski leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Carlos Moya won the 2001 Canadian Open round of 64 6-3 4-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Greg Rusedski
GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Carlos Moya
ESP Age 50 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Carlos Moya #16 6-3 4-6 6-4 Greg Rusedski #36 Match data Aug 1, 2001* R64 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard
Greg Rusedski #6 6-3 7-5 Carlos Moya #18 Match data Mar 14, 1998* R16 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Carlos Moya #5 6-2 6-2 Greg Rusedski #11 Match data Sep 13, 1997* SF Bournemouth World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Greg Rusedski #56 6-3 6-4 Carlos Moya #24 Match data Oct 23, 1996* R64 Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,052 417 278 60.0% 0 1 1 3 10 15
Carlos Moya #667 #1 3,516 2,029 554 310 64.1% 1 3 0 3 13 20

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Carlos Moya
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 1995 11–7 61.1% #61 1,624 0 1
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 1996 42–28 60.0% #28 1,762 0 2
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,682 0 1 1997 53–29 64.6% #7 1,817 0 3
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1998 45–23 66.2% #5 1,896 1 5
22 1996 38–26 59.4% #48 1,816 0 3 1999 35–22 61.4% #23 1,761 1 5
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,941 0 5 2000 32–21 60.4% #41 1,820 1 6
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 2001 34–23 59.6% #19 1,736 1 7
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,970 0 9 2002 59–21 73.8% #5 1,970 1 11
26 2000 19–20 48.7% #69 1,796 0 9 2003 51–20 71.8% #7 1,905 1 14
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,809 0 10 2004 56–18 75.7% #5 1,894 1 17
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,902 0 12 2005 32–20 61.5% #31 1,801 1 18
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,823 0 13 2006 30–22 57.7% #43 1,758 1 19
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,821 0 14 2007 42–23 64.6% #17 1,862 1 20
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,786 0 15 2008 28–23 54.9% #42 1,802 1 20
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,640 0 15 2009 2–4 33.3% #446 1,715 1 20
33 — — — — — — — 2010 2–6 25.0% #516 1,659 1 20

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Greg Rusedski Carlos Moya
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1992 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 11 7 18 61.1% — — — — — — — —
19 1993 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 1996 3 5 8 37.5% 35 16 51 68.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
20 1994 9 15 24 37.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1997 25 11 36 69.4% 25 12 37 67.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
21 1995 23 15 38 60.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1998 15 12 27 55.6% 28 7 35 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1996 19 15 34 55.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 4 14 71.4% 1999 15 11 26 57.7% 16 8 24 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1997 19 11 30 63.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 13 2 15 86.7% 18 6 24 75.0% 2000 15 10 25 60.0% 16 8 24 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1998 34 11 45 75.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 14 4 18 77.8% 2001 12 11 23 52.2% 18 8 26 69.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0%
25 1999 25 10 35 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 2002 22 12 34 64.7% 34 7 41 82.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
26 2000 14 12 26 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2003 20 12 32 62.5% 31 8 39 79.5% — — — — — — — —
27 2001 23 15 38 60.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 3 12 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2004 23 10 33 69.7% 30 7 37 81.1% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
28 2002 24 11 35 68.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 2005 16 10 26 61.5% 16 10 26 61.5% — — — — — — — —
29 2003 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2006 12 11 23 52.2% 18 11 29 62.1% — — — — — — — —
30 2004 9 8 17 52.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 2007 17 12 29 58.6% 25 10 35 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2005 14 13 27 51.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2008 15 12 27 55.6% 13 11 24 54.2% — — — — — — — —
32 2006 4 9 13 30.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 225 158 383 58.7% 25 45 70 35.7% 82 35 117 70.1% 85 40 125 68.0% — 212 144 356 59.6% 318 135 453 70.2% 12 15 27 44.4% 12 16 28 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 600/695 of Greg Rusedski's and 779/864 of Carlos Moya's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Greg Rusedski Carlos Moya
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1992 4/4 9.8 7.0 51.6% 77.5% 36.6% 52.3% 35.2% 57.2% 41.6% 1995 17/18 1.7 1.1 66.9% 61.1% 56.3% 54.6% 46.0% 59.2% 41.4%
19 1993 23/25 14.0 4.9 57.6% 82.3% 54.7% 68.5% 39.0% 70.5% 32.3% 1996 63/70 3.0 1.9 65.7% 68.1% 51.1% 53.5% 48.7% 62.1% 41.5%
20 1994 46/50 9.2 5.2 56.6% 78.6% 51.6% 59.6% 32.6% 66.8% 34.0% 1997 67/82 3.0 2.2 62.5% 67.9% 50.2% 56.8% 51.9% 60.9% 41.3%
21 1995 50/59 11.7 6.1 56.7% 81.6% 49.8% 64.1% 40.5% 67.8% 34.9% 1998 55/68 5.1 2.4 55.4% 71.4% 51.6% 58.3% 43.3% 62.3% 41.0%
22 1996 53/64 11.6 2.9 60.5% 81.7% 53.2% 57.4% 39.6% 70.7% 36.8% 1999 53/57 5.0 3.2 53.7% 69.9% 48.7% 58.0% 38.9% 60.0% 39.8%
23 1997 61/76 14.0 4.6 57.5% 85.1% 57.1% 67.5% 45.1% 73.2% 35.2% 2000 40/53 4.9 2.7 54.4% 73.7% 53.5% 62.4% 44.6% 64.5% 38.8%
24 1998 59/72 12.0 5.0 55.8% 82.2% 54.4% 68.1% 41.7% 69.8% 35.3% 2001 51/57 6.2 2.2 57.0% 74.0% 54.1% 58.8% 41.4% 65.4% 38.1%
25 1999 51/68 10.5 4.7 58.2% 80.2% 54.7% 62.4% 35.4% 69.4% 35.5% 2002 68/80 4.7 2.4 60.8% 74.9% 52.8% 60.0% 39.8% 66.2% 40.0%
26 2000 35/39 9.0 5.0 57.8% 76.0% 52.5% 67.6% 37.4% 66.1% 35.5% 2003 67/71 6.6 3.2 55.4% 75.6% 54.5% 64.5% 44.6% 66.1% 40.9%
27 2001 52/61 10.3 3.4 58.7% 80.6% 54.5% 60.6% 36.9% 69.8% 36.4% 2004 69/74 7.2 2.7 56.7% 76.9% 55.9% 63.6% 42.9% 67.7% 38.3%
28 2002 39/49 11.0 4.0 60.9% 79.5% 54.3% 71.1% 41.1% 69.6% 34.3% 2005 50/52 5.1 2.6 59.6% 73.3% 50.6% 61.5% 46.6% 64.0% 37.8%
29 2003 19/19 12.4 4.0 63.5% 78.9% 56.2% 72.5% 43.3% 70.5% 33.7% 2006 51/52 6.2 2.5 58.5% 73.3% 50.6% 63.5% 38.4% 63.9% 36.7%
30 2004 39/39 11.2 5.6 60.0% 78.2% 53.7% 68.1% 45.0% 68.3% 32.2% 2007 64/65 5.8 2.8 61.8% 73.2% 51.6% 61.5% 44.1% 64.7% 38.3%
31 2005 48/49 9.6 5.8 57.5% 77.2% 53.4% 69.9% 33.8% 67.0% 31.6% 2008 51/51 5.2 2.5 61.4% 70.5% 54.8% 56.2% 38.8% 64.5% 34.9%
32 2006 21/21 6.2 4.5 60.8% 66.8% 47.5% 53.1% 38.7% 59.3% 31.1% 2009 6/6 5.2 4.5 54.2% 73.0% 51.5% 53.2% 38.4% 62.7% 32.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 7/8 3.6 2.1 58.8% 65.0% 47.9% 46.0% 47.9% 58.1% 32.2%
Career — 600/695 11.0 4.7 58.3% 79.9% 53.5% 64.8% 39.2% 68.8% 34.6% — 779/864 5.1 2.5 59.0% 72.2% 52.4% 59.6% 43.6% 63.9% 39.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Greg Rusedski Carlos Moya
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1992 1526 107.0 -1.85 +0.57 0.973 49.7% +36 — — 44.4% -0.67 1–0 1–0 — +0.33 1995 1625 122.9 -0.16 +0.33 1.013 50.2% — +58 — 56.1% +0.12 4–1 (80%) 3–4 (43%) — +1.02
19 1993 1751 140.1 +5.69 -3.01 1.097 51.2% -45 — -48 56.7% +0.22 10–5 (67%) 14–14 (50%) — +0.39 1996 1762 150.4 +1.08 +3.10 1.096 51.9% -150 +75 — 56.1% +0.59 11–8 (58%) 15–13 (54%) — -0.34
20 1994 1683 135.7 +4.03 -2.97 1.022 50.1% -25 -116 +29 46.6% -0.07 8–14 (36%) 15–19 (44%) — -1.22 1997 1817 155.8 -0.08 +3.21 1.056 51.1% +14 +60 -246 57.5% +0.55 21–8 (72%) 12–21 (36%) — -1.62
21 1995 1699 145.1 +4.49 -2.03 1.085 51.6% +23 -70 +37 56.7% +0.38 8–11 (42%) 22–16 (58%) — -0.02 1998 1897 158.7 +0.95 +3.17 1.087 51.5% -44 +172 -324 62.1% +0.58 12–7 (63%) 18–8 (69%) — -2.63
22 1996 1816 150.0 +6.92 +0.08 1.258 53.0% +15 -174 -46 56.9% +0.43 12–11 (52%) 26–20 (57%) — -1.78 1999 1762 141.1 -1.24 +1.76 0.996 49.8% +2 +190 -151 59.5% +0.37 13–9 (59%) 12–11 (52%) — +1.37
23 1997 1942 156.9 +9.49 -0.70 1.316 53.9% +9 -283 -3 66.8% +0.94 16–12 (57%) 27–18 (60%) — -3.68 2000 1820 146.0 +2.45 +1.57 1.095 51.8% +9 +49 -274 60.0% +0.43 9–13 (41%) 15–11 (58%) — -3.30
24 1998 2012 159.3 +6.82 -1.21 1.168 52.2% +36 -417 -143 63.6% +0.73 16–5 (76%) 30–15 (67%) — -1.21 2001 1736 146.1 +2.90 +0.43 1.100 51.5% +41 +139 -186 58.2% +0.36 10–11 (48%) 11–9 (55%) — +1.01
25 1999 1971 155.1 +6.15 -1.39 1.158 52.0% +40 -346 -93 63.5% +0.81 12–9 (57%) 19–14 (58%) — -0.97 2002 1971 156.2 +4.12 +2.41 1.185 52.6% -42 +39 — 66.0% +0.89 19–7 (73%) 25–11 (69%) — -1.10
26 2000 1796 149.4 +3.25 -1.02 1.047 50.8% +86 -203 +44 51.1% +0.01 3–7 (30%) 16–10 (62%) — -3.02 2003 1905 153.0 +3.88 +3.65 1.207 53.2% -13 +88 — 66.7% +1.04 13–11 (54%) 17–17 (50%) — +1.32
27 2001 1810 149.1 +6.33 -0.53 1.203 52.7% +5 -205 +93 59.1% +0.65 6–5 (55%) 21–16 (57%) — -1.81 2004 1895 151.7 +4.66 +1.24 1.186 52.7% -31 +163 -252 67.7% +0.94 18–6 (75%) 20–9 (69%) — +1.49
28 2002 1902 150.0 +6.06 -1.57 1.129 51.6% +23 — -18 61.0% +0.69 15–7 (68%) 16–15 (52%) — -2.14 2005 1802 145.3 +1.89 +0.56 1.050 50.9% +2 +153 — 57.6% +0.36 9–9 (50%) 13–11 (54%) — +0.86
29 2003 1824 128.0 +5.26 -0.65 1.144 51.8% +15 — +122 56.0% +0.26 3–4 (43%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.36 2006 1759 140.5 +2.22 -0.58 1.018 50.4% +7 +122 — 54.9% +0.18 14–7 (67%) 15–10 (60%) — -0.66
30 2004 1821 132.1 +3.67 -2.78 1.017 50.5% -4 — +106 55.7% +0.14 12–8 (60%) 22–10 (69%) — -0.15 2007 1862 154.0 +2.20 +2.02 1.085 51.5% -46 +130 — 61.4% +0.61 13–9 (59%) 15–9 (63%) — -0.30
31 2005 1787 139.4 +3.29 -2.83 0.958 49.7% -6 -261 +180 49.6% +0.03 14–3 (82%) 14–17 (45%) — -1.02 2008 1802 143.5 +1.18 -1.42 0.981 49.5% +3 +61 — 51.1% -0.01 15–8 (65%) 18–12 (60%) — +1.20
32 2006 1641 131.5 -1.70 -3.52 0.764 46.0% +59 -130 — 29.8% -1.21 2–1 (67%) 3–6 (33%) — -1.33 2009 1716 107.3 -0.28 -2.72 0.875 48.1% +39 +108 — 33.3% -0.67 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +1.05
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1660 107.6 -1.98 -2.23 0.769 45.3% +63 +99 — 31.3% -1.31 0–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.30
Career — 2053 153.7 +5.40 -1.57 1.110 51.5% +18 -222 +32 57.4% +0.42 138–102 (58%) 252–196 (56%) 107.0 -2.75 — 2030 154.8 +1.99 +1.65 1.084 51.4% -14 +105 -232 59.9% +0.53 182–116 (61%) 212–160 (57%) 103.7 -0.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.