H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Greg Rusedski vs Carlos Moya H2H: 2-2
Greg Rusedski and Carlos Moya are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Greg Rusedski leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Carlos Moya won the 2001 Canada Masters second round 6-3 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 52
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2001* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Carlos Moya | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | Greg Rusedski | Match data |
| Mar 14, 1998* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Greg Rusedski | 6-3 7-5 | Carlos Moya | Match data |
| Sep 13, 1997* | Bournemouth | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Carlos Moya | 6-2 6-2 | Greg Rusedski | Match data |
| Oct 23, 1996* | Stuttgart Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Carpet | Greg Rusedski | 6-3 6-4 | Carlos Moya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greg Rusedski | #944 | #4 | 3,094 | 2,049 | 415 | 276 | 60.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 15 |
| Carlos Moya | #667 | #1 | 3,516 | 2,033 | 551 | 309 | 64.1% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 20 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Greg Rusedski | Carlos Moya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1992 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #161 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #61 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1993 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1994 | 21–29 | 42.0% | #114 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 53–29 | 64.6% | #7 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1995 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #5 | 1,894 | 1 | 5 |
| 22 | 1996 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #48 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #23 | 1,762 | 1 | 5 |
| 23 | 1997 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #6 | 1,950 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #41 | 1,811 | 1 | 6 |
| 24 | 1998 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #9 | 2,011 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #19 | 1,735 | 1 | 7 |
| 25 | 1999 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #14 | 1,976 | 0 | 9 | 2002 | 59–21 | 73.8% | #5 | 1,970 | 1 | 11 |
| 26 | 2000 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,802 | 0 | 9 | 2003 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #7 | 1,904 | 1 | 14 |
| 27 | 2001 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #31 | 1,807 | 0 | 10 | 2004 | 53–17 | 75.7% | #5 | 1,903 | 1 | 17 |
| 28 | 2002 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #31 | 1,904 | 0 | 12 | 2005 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #31 | 1,803 | 1 | 18 |
| 29 | 2003 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #119 | 1,825 | 0 | 13 | 2006 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #43 | 1,756 | 1 | 19 |
| 30 | 2004 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #46 | 1,819 | 0 | 14 | 2007 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #17 | 1,862 | 1 | 20 |
| 31 | 2005 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #37 | 1,780 | 0 | 15 | 2008 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #42 | 1,802 | 1 | 20 |
| 32 | 2006 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #191 | 1,638 | 0 | 15 | 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #446 | 1,715 | 1 | 20 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #516 | 1,651 | 1 | 20 |