H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 1-3

Cedric Pioline holds a 3–1 lead over Greg Rusedski in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 2–0 on grass, while Greg Rusedski leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 2000 US Open second round 6-7(4) 3-6 6-4 7-6(6) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Greg Rusedski
GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 1, 2000* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Cedric Pioline #10 6-7(4) 3-6 6-4 7-6(6) 6-3 Greg Rusedski #34 Match data
Jun 19, 1999* Nottingham ATP 250 SF Grass Cedric Pioline #52 6-4 7-6(4) Greg Rusedski #13 Match data
Feb 20, 1999* Rotterdam ATP 250 QF Carpet Greg Rusedski #9 7-6(5) 3-6 7-6(5) Cedric Pioline #18 Match data
Jul 4, 1997* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Cedric Pioline #44 6-4 4-6 6-4 6-3 Greg Rusedski #27 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,049 415 276 60.1% 0 1 1 0 13 15
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,681 0 1 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1996 36–25 59.0% #48 1,805 0 3 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,950 0 5 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,976 0 9 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 2000 19–19 50.0% #69 1,802 0 9 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,807 0 10 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,904 0 12 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,825 0 13 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,819 0 14 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,780 0 15 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,638 0 15 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5