H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs David Prinosil H2H: 5-2

Greg Rusedski holds a 5–2 lead over David Prinosil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Greg Rusedski leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 2001 Cincinnati Masters second round 3-6 7-6(6) 6-1.

GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
5 2
7 main draw meetings
GER Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 8, 2001* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Greg Rusedski #36 3-6 7-6(6) 6-1 David Prinosil #52 Match data
May 9, 2001* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Greg Rusedski #52 6-3 6-2 David Prinosil #29 Match data
Mar 21, 2001* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard David Prinosil #30 6-3 6-2 Greg Rusedski #43 Match data
Sep 3, 1999* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Greg Rusedski #8 6-4 6-3 6-1 David Prinosil #56 Match data
May 26, 1999* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Greg Rusedski #13 6-4 6-4 6-7(4) 6-4 David Prinosil #58 Match data
Oct 9, 1998* Basel ATP 250 R16 Hard David Prinosil #73 7-6(4) 7-5 Greg Rusedski #14 Match data
Oct 2, 1997* Basel ATP 250 R32 Carpet Greg Rusedski #10 4-6 6-4 7-5 David Prinosil #58 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,049 415 276 60.1% 0 1 1 0 13 15
David Prinosil #1,091 #28 1,040 1,800 165 208 44.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski David Prinosil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 1992 9–9 50.0% #125 1,584 0 0
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,681 0 1 1993 16–25 39.0% #77 1,633 0 0
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1994 8–13 38.1% #130 1,630 0 0
22 1996 36–25 59.0% #48 1,805 0 3 1995 19–18 51.4% #50 1,708 0 1
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,950 0 5 1996 24–23 51.1% #39 1,779 0 2
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 1997 16–26 38.1% #89 1,633 0 2
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,976 0 9 1998 20–25 44.4% #78 1,622 0 2
26 2000 19–19 50.0% #69 1,802 0 9 1999 22–23 48.9% #66 1,672 0 2
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,807 0 10 2000 22–17 56.4% #38 1,788 0 3
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,904 0 12 2001 7–22 24.1% #132 1,606 0 3
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,825 0 13 2002 2–2 50.0% #229 1,593 0 3
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,819 0 14 2003 0–4 0.0% #276 1,521 0 3
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,780 0 15 2004 0–1 0.0% #1063 1,515 0 3
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,638 0 15