H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs David Witt H2H: 1-1

Greg Rusedski and David Witt are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, David Witt leads 1–0 on grass, while Greg Rusedski leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 1998 Australian Open round of 128 7-6(4) 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Greg Rusedski
GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
David Witt
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Greg Rusedski #6 7-6(4) 6-3 6-4 David Witt #208 Match data Jan 21, 1998* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
David Witt #209 6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 Greg Rusedski #42 Match data Jul 8, 1994* R16 Newport ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,052 417 278 60.0% 0 1 1 3 10 15
David Witt #1,466 #128 331 1,601 15 23 39.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski David Witt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #553 1,483 0 0
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 1991 2–4 33.3% #275 1,503 0 0
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 1992 0–2 0.0% #216 1,480 0 0
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,682 0 1 1993 5–7 41.7% #176 1,509 0 0
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1994 6–5 54.5% #158 1,588 0 0
22 1996 38–26 59.4% #48 1,816 0 3 1995 0–1 0.0% #778 1,572 0 0
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,941 0 5 — — — — — — —
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 1997 2–1 66.7% #205 1,593 0 0
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,970 0 9 1998 0–2 0.0% #533 1,568 0 0
26 2000 19–20 48.7% #69 1,796 0 9 — — — — — — —
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,809 0 10 — — — — — — —
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,902 0 12 — — — — — — —
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,823 0 13 — — — — — — —
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,821 0 14 — — — — — — —
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,786 0 15 — — — — — — —
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,640 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Greg Rusedski David Witt
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1994 9 15 24 37.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1993 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1995 23 15 38 60.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1994 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
22 1996 19 15 34 55.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 4 14 71.4% 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1997 19 11 30 63.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 13 2 15 86.7% 18 6 24 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1998 34 11 45 75.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 14 4 18 77.8% 1997 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
25 1999 25 10 35 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2000 14 12 26 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2001 23 15 38 60.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 3 12 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2002 24 11 35 68.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 9 8 17 52.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 14 13 27 51.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2006 4 9 13 30.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 225 158 383 58.7% 25 45 70 35.7% 82 35 117 70.1% 85 40 125 68.0% — 3 11 14 21.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 600/695 of Greg Rusedski's and 30/37 of David Witt's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Greg Rusedski David Witt
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1992 4/4 9.8 7.0 51.6% 77.5% 36.6% 52.3% 35.2% 57.2% 41.6% 1991 5/6 6.2 5.6 55.3% 78.1% 45.4% 61.8% 43.3% 63.4% 35.5%
19 1993 23/25 14.0 4.9 57.6% 82.3% 54.7% 68.5% 39.0% 70.5% 32.3% 1992 2/2 10.0 3.0 50.7% 73.3% 41.3% 34.3% 75.0% 58.0% 34.7%
20 1994 46/50 9.2 5.2 56.6% 78.6% 51.6% 59.6% 32.6% 66.8% 34.0% 1993 6/12 4.7 5.2 47.5% 68.3% 45.1% 58.4% 35.2% 56.1% 32.7%
21 1995 50/59 11.7 6.1 56.7% 81.6% 49.8% 64.1% 40.5% 67.8% 34.9% 1994 11/11 8.9 3.6 54.2% 76.0% 47.7% 60.6% 41.0% 63.4% 37.5%
22 1996 53/64 11.6 2.9 60.5% 81.7% 53.2% 57.4% 39.6% 70.7% 36.8% 1995 1/1 8.0 1.0 52.8% 71.4% 44.0% 66.7% 0.0% 58.5% 19.6%
23 1997 61/76 14.0 4.6 57.5% 85.1% 57.1% 67.5% 45.1% 73.2% 35.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1998 59/72 12.0 5.0 55.8% 82.2% 54.4% 68.1% 41.7% 69.8% 35.3% 1997 3/3 4.0 3.0 46.7% 63.6% 49.1% 66.2% 36.1% 56.5% 36.9%
25 1999 51/68 10.5 4.7 58.2% 80.2% 54.7% 62.4% 35.4% 69.4% 35.5% 1998 2/2 4.0 2.5 53.4% 63.1% 43.9% 35.4% 16.7% 54.3% 24.9%
26 2000 35/39 9.0 5.0 57.8% 76.0% 52.5% 67.6% 37.4% 66.1% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2001 52/61 10.3 3.4 58.7% 80.6% 54.5% 60.6% 36.9% 69.8% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2002 39/49 11.0 4.0 60.9% 79.5% 54.3% 71.1% 41.1% 69.6% 34.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 19/19 12.4 4.0 63.5% 78.9% 56.2% 72.5% 43.3% 70.5% 33.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 39/39 11.2 5.6 60.0% 78.2% 53.7% 68.1% 45.0% 68.3% 32.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 48/49 9.6 5.8 57.5% 77.2% 53.4% 69.9% 33.8% 67.0% 31.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2006 21/21 6.2 4.5 60.8% 66.8% 47.5% 53.1% 38.7% 59.3% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Greg Rusedski David Witt
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1483 99.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — +0.08
18 1992 1526 107.0 -1.85 +0.57 0.973 49.7% +36 — — 44.4% -0.67 1–0 1–0 — +0.33 1991 1504 123.3 +0.21 -0.48 0.971 50.1% +31 — — 47.1% -0.18 0–3 (0%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.49
19 1993 1751 140.1 +5.69 -3.01 1.097 51.2% -45 — -48 56.7% +0.22 10–5 (67%) 14–14 (50%) — +0.39 1992 1480 98.8 +1.42 -1.66 0.825 46.7% — — — 20.0% -1.40 0–1 — — +0.11
20 1994 1683 135.7 +4.03 -2.97 1.022 50.1% -25 -116 +29 46.6% -0.07 8–14 (36%) 15–19 (44%) — -1.22 1993 1509 106.9 -2.35 -2.24 0.745 45.0% -44 — +115 41.4% -0.93 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.39
21 1995 1699 145.1 +4.49 -2.03 1.085 51.6% +23 -70 +37 56.7% +0.38 8–11 (42%) 22–16 (58%) — -0.02 1994 1589 119.3 +0.59 +0.23 1.024 50.8% — +2 +39 50.0% +0.13 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.09
22 1996 1816 150.0 +6.92 +0.08 1.258 53.0% +15 -174 -46 56.9% +0.43 12–11 (52%) 26–20 (57%) — -1.78 1995 1573 97.2 -2.13 -0.13 0.471 40.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.06
23 1997 1942 156.9 +9.49 -0.70 1.316 53.9% +9 -283 -3 66.8% +0.94 16–12 (57%) 27–18 (60%) — -3.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1998 2012 159.3 +6.82 -1.21 1.168 52.2% +36 -417 -143 63.6% +0.73 16–5 (76%) 30–15 (67%) — -1.21 1997 1594 105.7 -0.82 +0.11 0.848 47.1% — +11 — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.18
25 1999 1971 155.1 +6.15 -1.39 1.158 52.0% +40 -346 -93 63.5% +0.81 12–9 (57%) 19–14 (58%) — -0.97 1998 1569 104.5 -2.56 -0.33 0.546 39.1% — — — 0.0% -2.80 — 0–1 — -0.10
26 2000 1796 149.4 +3.25 -1.02 1.047 50.8% +86 -203 +44 51.1% +0.01 3–7 (30%) 16–10 (62%) — -3.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2001 1810 149.1 +6.33 -0.53 1.203 52.7% +5 -205 +93 59.1% +0.65 6–5 (55%) 21–16 (57%) — -1.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2002 1902 150.0 +6.06 -1.57 1.129 51.6% +23 — -18 61.0% +0.69 15–7 (68%) 16–15 (52%) — -2.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 1824 128.0 +5.26 -0.65 1.144 51.8% +15 — +122 56.0% +0.26 3–4 (43%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 1821 132.1 +3.67 -2.78 1.017 50.5% -4 — +106 55.7% +0.14 12–8 (60%) 22–10 (69%) — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 1787 139.4 +3.29 -2.83 0.958 49.7% -6 -261 +180 49.6% +0.03 14–3 (82%) 14–17 (45%) — -1.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2006 1641 131.5 -1.70 -3.52 0.764 46.0% +59 -130 — 29.8% -1.21 2–1 (67%) 3–6 (33%) — -1.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2053 153.7 +5.40 -1.57 1.110 51.5% +18 -222 +32 57.4% +0.42 138–102 (58%) 252–196 (56%) 107.0 -2.75 — 1602 117.7 -0.45 -0.57 0.866 47.8% +1 +7 +77 40.0% -0.65 4–6 (40%) 6–5 (55%) 102.7 +0.37

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.