H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Fabrice Santoro H2H: 2-3

Fabrice Santoro holds a 3–2 lead over Greg Rusedski in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Fabrice Santoro leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Greg Rusedski leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Fabrice Santoro won the 2006 Marseille fourth round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Greg Rusedski
GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Fabrice Santoro
FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 17, 2006* Marseille ATP 250 R16 Hard Fabrice Santoro #41 6-3 6-2 Greg Rusedski #45 Match data
Feb 15, 2002* Marseille ATP 250 R16 Hard Greg Rusedski #30 6-3 5-7 6-4 Fabrice Santoro #26 Match data
Jun 1, 2001* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Fabrice Santoro #43 6-1 6-7(4) 6-3 7-5 Greg Rusedski #49 Match data
Oct 7, 1999* Basel ATP 250 R32 Carpet Greg Rusedski #8 7-6(3) 6-2 Fabrice Santoro #38 Match data
Jan 10, 1998* Doha ATP 250 QF Hard Fabrice Santoro #29 6-2 3-6 6-3 Greg Rusedski #6 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,049 415 276 60.1% 0 1 1 0 13 15
Fabrice Santoro #142 #17 1,516 1,889 456 432 51.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Fabrice Santoro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1989 3–6 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1990 15–16 48.4% #62 1,684 0 0
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 1991 26–21 55.3% #43 1,697 0 0
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 1992 25–22 53.2% #43 1,728 0 0
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,681 0 1 1993 24–26 48.0% #55 1,628 0 0
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1994 24–18 57.1% #46 1,734 0 0
22 1996 36–25 59.0% #48 1,805 0 3 1995 16–25 39.0% #102 1,609 0 0
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,950 0 5 1996 6–12 33.3% #118 1,555 0 0
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 1997 32–23 58.2% #29 1,804 0 1
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,976 0 9 1998 27–27 50.0% #41 1,709 0 1
26 2000 19–19 50.0% #69 1,802 0 9 1999 36–25 59.0% #34 1,765 0 2
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,807 0 10 2000 32–26 55.2% #31 1,727 0 3
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,904 0 12 2001 35–26 57.4% #22 1,769 0 3
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,825 0 13 2002 27–25 51.9% #35 1,739 0 4
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,819 0 14 2003 17–21 44.7% #62 1,708 0 4
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,780 0 15 2004 17–14 54.8% #52 1,817 0 4
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,638 0 15 2005 18–19 48.6% #58 1,782 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2006 19–23 45.2% #52 1,700 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2007 24–19 55.8% #37 1,785 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2008 18–17 51.4% #52 1,755 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2009 15–20 42.9% #68 1,694 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #142 1,688 0 6