H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Greg Rusedski vs Felix Mantilla H2H: 1-2
Felix Mantilla holds a 2–1 lead over Greg Rusedski in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Felix Mantilla leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 2002 Indianapolis final 6-7(6) 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 52
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2002 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Greg Rusedski | 6-7(6) 6-4 6-4 | Felix Mantilla | Match data |
| Jan 15, 1997* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Felix Mantilla | 6-4 5-7 7-5 6-2 | Greg Rusedski | Match data |
| May 24, 1996* | St. Poelten | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Felix Mantilla | 6-2 6-7(3) 6-3 | Greg Rusedski | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greg Rusedski | #944 | #4 | 3,094 | 2,049 | 415 | 276 | 60.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 15 |
| Felix Mantilla | #1,133 | #10 | 2,385 | 1,960 | 307 | 218 | 58.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Greg Rusedski | Felix Mantilla | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1992 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #161 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 21–29 | 42.0% | #114 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 10–5 | 66.7% | #92 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 48–27 | 64.0% | #18 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1996 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #48 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 49–22 | 69.0% | #16 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1997 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #6 | 1,950 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #20 | 1,807 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1998 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #9 | 2,011 | 0 | 7 | 1999 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,723 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1999 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #14 | 1,976 | 0 | 9 | 2000 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #99 | 1,670 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 2000 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,802 | 0 | 9 | 2001 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,775 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 2001 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #31 | 1,807 | 0 | 10 | 2002 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #55 | 1,733 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2002 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #31 | 1,904 | 0 | 12 | 2003 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #22 | 1,709 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2003 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #119 | 1,825 | 0 | 13 | 2004 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #102 | 1,693 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 2004 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #46 | 1,819 | 0 | 14 | 2005 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #117 | 1,669 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 2005 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #37 | 1,780 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2006 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #191 | 1,638 | 0 | 15 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #425 | 1,650 | 0 | 10 |