H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Greg Rusedski vs Fernando Vicente H2H: 0-2
Fernando Vicente holds a 2–0 lead over Greg Rusedski in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Fernando Vicente leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Vicente won the 2000 Vienna fourth round 6-2 6-7(4) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 52
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2000* | Vienna | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Fernando Vicente | 6-2 6-7(4) 6-2 | Greg Rusedski | Match data |
| May 10, 2000* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Fernando Vicente | 6-3 6-1 | Greg Rusedski | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greg Rusedski | #944 | #4 | 3,094 | 2,049 | 415 | 276 | 60.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 15 |
| Fernando Vicente | #1,019 | #29 | 993 | 1,762 | 158 | 212 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Greg Rusedski | Fernando Vicente | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1992 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #161 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #151 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 21–29 | 42.0% | #114 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #48 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #49 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1997 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #6 | 1,950 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 23–31 | 42.6% | #47 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1998 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #9 | 2,011 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,637 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1999 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #14 | 1,976 | 0 | 9 | 2002 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #58 | 1,618 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2000 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,802 | 0 | 9 | 2003 | 20–29 | 40.8% | #63 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2001 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #31 | 1,807 | 0 | 10 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #187 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2002 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #31 | 1,904 | 0 | 12 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #110 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2003 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #119 | 1,825 | 0 | 13 | 2006 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #111 | 1,461 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2004 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #46 | 1,819 | 0 | 14 | 2007 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,508 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2005 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #37 | 1,780 | 0 | 15 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,484 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2006 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #191 | 1,638 | 0 | 15 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,489 | 0 | 3 |