H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Gianluca Pozzi H2H: 4-0

Greg Rusedski holds a 4–0 lead over Gianluca Pozzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Greg Rusedski leads 3–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 2001 Milan third round 6-1 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Greg Rusedski
GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Gianluca Pozzi
ITA Age 61 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 1, 2001* Milan ATP 250 R32 Carpet Greg Rusedski #52 6-1 7-5 Gianluca Pozzi #40 Match data
Jun 17, 1999* Nottingham ATP 250 R32 Grass Greg Rusedski #13 6-0 6-0 Gianluca Pozzi #77 Match data
Feb 25, 1999* London ATP 250 R32 Carpet Greg Rusedski #10 6-2 6-1 Gianluca Pozzi #65 Match data
Feb 5, 1998* Split ATP 250 R32 Carpet Greg Rusedski #8 6-3 6-4 Gianluca Pozzi #81 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,049 415 276 60.1% 0 1 1 0 13 15
Gianluca Pozzi #1,466 #40 864 1,783 172 257 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Gianluca Pozzi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,681 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1986 0–2 0.0% #277 1,480 0 0
22 1996 36–25 59.0% #48 1,805 0 3 1987 1–2 33.3% #153 1,501 0 0
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,950 0 5 1988 4–8 33.3% #165 1,507 0 0
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 1989 7–11 38.9% #179 1,533 0 0
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,976 0 9 1990 1–8 11.1% #185 1,461 0 0
26 2000 19–19 50.0% #69 1,802 0 9 1991 16–13 55.2% #76 1,696 0 1
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,807 0 10 1992 28–28 50.0% #68 1,709 0 1
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,904 0 12 1993 13–26 33.3% #107 1,559 0 1
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,825 0 13 1994 11–18 37.9% #93 1,607 0 1
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,819 0 14 1995 10–22 31.2% #138 1,554 0 1
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,780 0 15 1996 7–14 33.3% #107 1,531 0 1
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,638 0 15 1997 3–7 30.0% #101 1,508 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 1998 22–27 44.9% #61 1,653 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 1999 16–26 38.1% #94 1,603 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2000 26–22 54.2% #43 1,728 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2001 7–23 23.3% #155 1,495 0 1