H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Guillaume Raoux H2H: 2-1

Greg Rusedski holds a 2–1 lead over Guillaume Raoux in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Greg Rusedski leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 1998 Antwerp fourth round 7-6(6) 3-6 7-6(13).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Greg Rusedski
GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Guillaume Raoux
FRA Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 20, 1998* Antwerp ATP 250 R16 Hard Greg Rusedski #9 7-6(6) 3-6 7-6(13) Guillaume Raoux #38 Match data
Sep 15, 1995* Bordeaux ATP 250 R16 Hard Guillaume Raoux #105 4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 Greg Rusedski #48 Match data
Jun 17, 1994* Manchester ATP 250 R16 Grass Greg Rusedski #46 7-6(5) 6-4 Guillaume Raoux #94 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,049 415 276 60.1% 0 1 1 0 13 15
Guillaume Raoux #1,033 #35 1,041 1,806 175 222 44.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Guillaume Raoux
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #448 1,492 0 0
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 1989 1–6 14.3% #220 1,462 0 0
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,681 0 1 1990 6–9 40.0% #84 1,529 0 0
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1991 14–25 35.9% #104 1,615 0 0
22 1996 36–25 59.0% #48 1,805 0 3 1992 14–16 46.7% #93 1,619 0 1
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,950 0 5 1993 27–28 49.1% #85 1,627 0 1
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 1994 15–20 42.9% #115 1,572 0 1
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,976 0 9 1995 17–22 43.6% #77 1,566 0 1
26 2000 19–19 50.0% #69 1,802 0 9 1996 21–21 50.0% #72 1,630 0 1
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,807 0 10 1997 26–26 50.0% #47 1,728 0 1
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,904 0 12 1998 24–27 47.1% #53 1,735 0 1
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,825 0 13 1999 10–19 34.5% #137 1,577 0 1
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,819 0 14 2000 0–2 0.0% #668 1,553 0 1
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,780 0 15 — — — — — — —
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,638 0 15 — — — — — — —