H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Hicham Arazi H2H: 4-1

Greg Rusedski holds a 4–1 lead over Hicham Arazi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Greg Rusedski leads 2–0 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 2003 Nottingham semifinal 7-5 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Greg Rusedski
GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Hicham Arazi
MAR Age 52 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 21, 2003* Nottingham ATP 250 SF Grass Greg Rusedski #68 7-5 7-5 Hicham Arazi #97 Match data
Jun 12, 2003* Queen's Club ATP 250 R32 Grass Greg Rusedski #69 6-4 6-4 Hicham Arazi #99 Match data
Oct 19, 2000* Toulouse ATP 250 R32 Hard Hicham Arazi #37 6-3 6-4 Greg Rusedski #67 Match data
Feb 27, 1999* London ATP 250 SF Carpet Greg Rusedski #10 6-2 6-3 Hicham Arazi #46 Match data
Feb 19, 1998* Antwerp ATP 250 R32 Hard Greg Rusedski #9 7-6(4) 3-6 6-3 Hicham Arazi #37 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,049 415 276 60.1% 0 1 1 0 13 15
Hicham Arazi #793 #22 1,240 1,864 202 213 48.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Hicham Arazi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,681 0 1 1994 0–1 0.0% #184 1,486 0 0
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1995 1–5 16.7% #141 1,457 0 0
22 1996 36–25 59.0% #48 1,805 0 3 1996 12–16 42.9% #79 1,550 0 0
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,950 0 5 1997 28–27 50.9% #38 1,624 0 1
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 1998 23–28 45.1% #36 1,714 0 1
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,976 0 9 1999 27–27 50.0% #36 1,702 0 1
26 2000 19–19 50.0% #69 1,802 0 9 2000 31–26 54.4% #30 1,775 0 1
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,807 0 10 2001 30–23 56.6% #25 1,833 0 1
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,904 0 12 2002 14–21 40.0% #90 1,699 0 1
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,825 0 13 2003 21–20 51.2% #52 1,718 0 1
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,819 0 14 2004 15–17 46.9% #62 1,711 0 1
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,780 0 15 2005 0–2 0.0% #897 1,672 0 1
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,638 0 15 — — — — — — —