H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Greg Rusedski vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 2-1
Greg Rusedski holds a 2–1 lead over Hyung-Taik Lee in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Greg Rusedski leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hyung-Taik Lee won the 2004 Queen's Club second round 3-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 52
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2004* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Hyung-Taik Lee | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Greg Rusedski | Match data |
| Jun 28, 2002* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Greg Rusedski | 6-1 6-4 5-7 6-2 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
| Apr 28, 1995* | Seoul | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Greg Rusedski | 6-4 6-4 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greg Rusedski | #944 | #4 | 3,094 | 2,049 | 415 | 276 | 60.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 15 |
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Greg Rusedski | Hyung-Taik Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1992 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #161 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 21–29 | 42.0% | #114 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #48 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #6 | 1,950 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #9 | 2,011 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #14 | 1,976 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,802 | 0 | 9 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #31 | 1,807 | 0 | 10 | 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #31 | 1,904 | 0 | 12 | 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 2003 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #119 | 1,825 | 0 | 13 | 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #46 | 1,819 | 0 | 14 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #37 | 1,780 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #191 | 1,638 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |