H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Ivo Karlovic H2H: 3-2

Greg Rusedski holds a 3–2 lead over Ivo Karlovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Ivo Karlovic leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Greg Rusedski leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 2006 New Haven second round 7-6(2) 6-7(7) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Greg Rusedski
GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Ivo Karlovic
CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 211 cm / 6'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 23, 2006* New Haven ATP 250 R64 Hard Greg Rusedski #138 7-6(2) 6-7(7) 6-2 Ivo Karlovic #69 Match data
Oct 19, 2005* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Ivo Karlovic #86 6-7(5) 7-6(2) 7-6(3) Greg Rusedski #38 Match data
Aug 5, 2005* Washington ATP 250 R16 Hard Ivo Karlovic #75 7-6(4) 6-2 Greg Rusedski #37 Match data
Oct 30, 2004* St. Petersburg ATP 250 QF Carpet Greg Rusedski #57 6-4 7-6(7) Ivo Karlovic #62 Match data
Oct 14, 2004* Moscow ATP 250 R32 Carpet Greg Rusedski #81 7-6(14) 6-2 Ivo Karlovic #63 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,049 415 276 60.1% 0 1 1 0 13 15
Ivo Karlovic #1,066 #14 2,295 1,998 357 333 51.7% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Ivo Karlovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,681 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 1996 36–25 59.0% #48 1,805 0 3 2001 0–1 0.0% #193 1,500 0 0
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,950 0 5 2002 1–2 33.3% #201 1,454 0 0
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 2003 9–7 56.2% #73 1,666 0 0
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,976 0 9 2004 16–24 40.0% #61 1,667 0 0
26 2000 19–19 50.0% #69 1,802 0 9 2005 17–22 43.6% #70 1,739 0 0
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,807 0 10 2006 16–18 47.1% #98 1,632 0 0
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,904 0 12 2007 45–21 68.2% #22 1,940 0 3
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,825 0 13 2008 29–25 53.7% #26 1,815 0 4
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,819 0 14 2009 21–22 48.8% #37 1,795 0 4
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,780 0 15 2010 16–9 64.0% #73 1,864 0 4
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,638 0 15 2011 16–20 44.4% #56 1,819 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2012 14–16 46.7% #100 1,768 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2013 15–13 53.6% #78 1,772 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2014 32–27 54.2% #27 1,853 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2015 38–25 60.3% #23 1,916 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2016 32–22 59.3% #20 1,970 0 8
38 — — — — — — — 2017 15–20 42.9% #80 1,770 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2018 11–16 40.7% #100 1,644 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2019 11–15 42.3% #95 1,668 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2020 1–4 20.0% #147 1,615 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2021 2–4 33.3% #279 1,623 0 8