H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Jacco Eltingh H2H: 0-1

Jacco Eltingh holds a 1–0 lead over Greg Rusedski in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jacco Eltingh leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jacco Eltingh won the 1993 Brisbane International round of 32 3-6 7-5 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Greg Rusedski
GBR Age 53 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Jacco Eltingh
NED Age 56 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jacco Eltingh #75 3-6 7-5 7-6(4) Greg Rusedski #133 Match data Sep 30, 1993* R32 Brisbane International ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,052 417 278 60.0% 0 1 1 3 10 15
Jacco Eltingh #1,378 #19 1,332 1,876 124 141 46.8% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Jacco Eltingh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 1989 0–1 0.0% #276 1,490 0 0
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 1990 3–2 60.0% #128 1,525 0 0
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,682 0 1 1991 12–24 33.3% #114 1,510 0 0
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1992 18–22 45.0% #78 1,591 0 1
22 1996 38–26 59.4% #48 1,816 0 3 1993 22–26 45.8% #63 1,634 0 2
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,941 0 5 1994 40–23 63.5% #23 1,829 0 4
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 1995 24–26 48.0% #43 1,772 0 4
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,970 0 9 1996 4–12 25.0% #307 1,617 0 4
26 2000 19–20 48.7% #69 1,796 0 9 1997 1–5 16.7% #604 1,557 0 4
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,809 0 10 — — — — — — —
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,902 0 12 — — — — — — —
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,823 0 13 — — — — — — —
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,821 0 14 — — — — — — —
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,786 0 15 — — — — — — —
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,640 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Greg Rusedski Jacco Eltingh
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1992 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1993 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 1990 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
20 1994 9 15 24 37.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1991 4 12 16 25.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1995 23 15 38 60.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1992 4 7 11 36.4% 7 8 15 46.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 5 7 28.6%
22 1996 19 15 34 55.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 4 14 71.4% 1993 10 13 23 43.5% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
23 1997 19 11 30 63.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 13 2 15 86.7% 18 6 24 75.0% 1994 10 8 18 55.6% 11 7 18 61.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 14 5 19 73.7%
24 1998 34 11 45 75.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 14 4 18 77.8% 1995 5 9 14 35.7% 5 7 12 41.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 7 13 46.2%
25 1999 25 10 35 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 1996 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2000 14 12 26 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1997 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 2001 23 15 38 60.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 3 12 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2002 24 11 35 68.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 9 8 17 52.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 14 13 27 51.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2006 4 9 13 30.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 225 158 383 58.7% 25 45 70 35.7% 82 35 117 70.1% 85 40 125 68.0% — 37 59 96 38.5% 34 36 70 48.6% 26 19 45 57.8% 27 27 54 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 600/695 of Greg Rusedski's and 221/259 of Jacco Eltingh's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Greg Rusedski Jacco Eltingh
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1992 4/4 9.8 7.0 51.6% 77.5% 36.6% 52.3% 35.2% 57.2% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 23/25 14.0 4.9 57.6% 82.3% 54.7% 68.5% 39.0% 70.5% 32.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 46/50 9.2 5.2 56.6% 78.6% 51.6% 59.6% 32.6% 66.8% 34.0% 1991 33/36 7.1 3.6 60.0% 67.4% 46.4% 49.1% 34.5% 59.1% 31.9%
21 1995 50/59 11.7 6.1 56.7% 81.6% 49.8% 64.1% 40.5% 67.8% 34.9% 1992 37/40 6.7 2.6 62.9% 72.4% 50.1% 68.9% 36.1% 64.2% 34.0%
22 1996 53/64 11.6 2.9 60.5% 81.7% 53.2% 57.4% 39.6% 70.7% 36.8% 1993 43/48 6.0 3.5 63.0% 72.6% 48.7% 58.3% 35.2% 63.5% 33.4%
23 1997 61/76 14.0 4.6 57.5% 85.1% 57.1% 67.5% 45.1% 73.2% 35.2% 1994 49/63 9.5 4.0 63.3% 76.3% 48.7% 61.2% 35.3% 66.1% 34.2%
24 1998 59/72 12.0 5.0 55.8% 82.2% 54.4% 68.1% 41.7% 69.8% 35.3% 1995 43/50 8.1 5.0 61.2% 74.7% 49.8% 61.9% 42.9% 65.0% 34.0%
25 1999 51/68 10.5 4.7 58.2% 80.2% 54.7% 62.4% 35.4% 69.4% 35.5% 1996 11/16 6.4 4.3 56.0% 74.8% 47.9% 50.6% 38.3% 63.0% 32.2%
26 2000 35/39 9.0 5.0 57.8% 76.0% 52.5% 67.6% 37.4% 66.1% 35.5% 1997 5/6 11.4 5.4 61.5% 74.9% 50.4% 56.3% 40.6% 65.6% 32.1%
27 2001 52/61 10.3 3.4 58.7% 80.6% 54.5% 60.6% 36.9% 69.8% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2002 39/49 11.0 4.0 60.9% 79.5% 54.3% 71.1% 41.1% 69.6% 34.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 19/19 12.4 4.0 63.5% 78.9% 56.2% 72.5% 43.3% 70.5% 33.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 39/39 11.2 5.6 60.0% 78.2% 53.7% 68.1% 45.0% 68.3% 32.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 48/49 9.6 5.8 57.5% 77.2% 53.4% 69.9% 33.8% 67.0% 31.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2006 21/21 6.2 4.5 60.8% 66.8% 47.5% 53.1% 38.7% 59.3% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 600/695 11.0 4.7 58.3% 79.9% 53.5% 64.8% 39.2% 68.8% 34.6% — 221/265 7.6 3.8 61.9% 73.2% 48.8% 59.6% 37.0% 63.9% 33.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Greg Rusedski Jacco Eltingh
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1992 1526 107.0 -1.85 +0.57 0.973 49.7% +36 — — 44.4% -0.67 1–0 1–0 — +0.33 1989 1490 100.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.02
19 1993 1751 140.1 +5.69 -3.01 1.097 51.2% -45 — -48 56.7% +0.22 10–5 (67%) 14–14 (50%) 108.0 +0.39 1990 1525 104.0 — — — — +51 — — 61.5% +0.85 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 96.6 +0.66
20 1994 1683 135.7 +4.03 -2.97 1.022 50.1% -25 -116 +29 46.6% -0.07 8–14 (36%) 15–19 (44%) 96.1 -1.22 1991 1510 114.5 -1.53 -5.09 0.781 45.9% -36 +33 +133 35.1% -1.07 4–5 (44%) 7–5 (58%) 102.4 +1.30
21 1995 1699 145.1 +4.49 -2.03 1.085 51.6% +23 -70 +37 56.7% +0.38 8–11 (42%) 22–16 (58%) 101.1 -0.02 1992 1591 132.8 +2.27 -3.70 0.949 49.5% -101 +22 +152 44.1% -0.41 8–8 (50%) 10–10 (50%) 105.3 -1.05
22 1996 1816 150.0 +6.92 +0.08 1.258 53.0% +15 -174 -46 56.9% +0.43 12–11 (52%) 26–20 (57%) 103.7 -1.78 1993 1635 126.1 +1.74 -3.99 0.916 48.5% -80 +16 +85 44.6% -0.42 5–2 (71%) 10–7 (59%) 106.8 -0.27
23 1997 1942 156.9 +9.49 -0.70 1.316 53.9% +9 -283 -3 66.8% +0.94 16–12 (57%) 27–18 (60%) 107.0 -3.68 1994 1829 139.4 +3.57 -2.91 1.009 50.3% -35 -81 -105 60.4% +0.25 11–9 (55%) 33–10 (77%) 113.1 +2.23
24 1998 2012 159.3 +6.82 -1.21 1.168 52.2% +36 -417 -143 63.6% +0.73 16–5 (76%) 30–15 (67%) 110.1 -1.21 1995 1772 145.8 +3.15 -2.97 0.973 50.2% -44 -33 +79 50.7% +0.03 7–8 (47%) 14–10 (58%) 102.1 -1.27
25 1999 1971 155.1 +6.15 -1.39 1.158 52.0% +40 -346 -93 63.5% +0.81 12–9 (57%) 19–14 (58%) 99.1 -0.97 1996 1618 118.1 +0.37 -3.11 0.871 47.9% +14 — +178 32.5% -1.05 1–4 (20%) 5–5 (50%) 94.7 -0.29
26 2000 1796 149.4 +3.25 -1.02 1.047 50.8% +86 -203 +44 51.1% +0.01 3–7 (30%) 16–10 (62%) 95.3 -3.02 1997 1557 105.0 +1.00 -1.87 0.932 48.8% +19 — — 31.3% -0.50 0–2 1–5 (17%) — +0.30
27 2001 1810 149.1 +6.33 -0.53 1.203 52.7% +5 -205 +93 59.1% +0.65 6–5 (55%) 21–16 (57%) 101.3 -1.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2002 1902 150.0 +6.06 -1.57 1.129 51.6% +23 — -18 61.0% +0.69 15–7 (68%) 16–15 (52%) 104.0 -2.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 1824 128.0 +5.26 -0.65 1.144 51.8% +15 — +122 56.0% +0.26 3–4 (43%) 6–6 (50%) 95.2 -1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 1821 132.1 +3.67 -2.78 1.017 50.5% -4 — +106 55.7% +0.14 12–8 (60%) 22–10 (69%) 107.8 -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 1787 139.4 +3.29 -2.83 0.958 49.7% -6 -261 +180 49.6% +0.03 14–3 (82%) 14–17 (45%) 104.6 -1.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2006 1641 131.5 -1.70 -3.52 0.764 46.0% +59 -130 — 29.8% -1.21 2–1 (67%) 3–6 (33%) 100.7 -1.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2053 153.7 +5.40 -1.57 1.110 51.5% +18 -222 +32 57.4% +0.42 138–102 (58%) 252–196 (56%) 107.0 -2.75 — 1876 135.5 +1.94 -3.58 0.927 49.0% -45 -14 +74 47.3% -0.28 37–40 (48%) 81–56 (59%) 108.3 +0.60

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.